These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33777756)

  • 1. CT-Based Collision Prediction Software for External-Beam Radiation Therapy.
    Wang YJ; Yao JS; Lai F; Cheng JC
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():617007. PubMed ID: 33777756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development and verification of a highly accurate collision prediction model for automated noncoplanar plan delivery.
    Yu VY; Tran A; Nguyen D; Cao M; Ruan D; Low DA; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6457-67. PubMed ID: 26520735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical note: A collision prediction tool using Blender.
    Guyer G; Mueller S; Wyss Y; Bertholet J; Schmid R; Stampanoni MFM; Manser P; Fix MK
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 24(11):e14165. PubMed ID: 37782250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and clinical implementation of eclipse scripting-based automated patient-specific collision avoidance software.
    Mann TD; Ploquin NP; Gill WR; Thind KS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 20(9):12-19. PubMed ID: 31282083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Collision Risk Mitigation of Varian TrueBeam Linear Accelerator With Supplemental Live-View Cameras.
    Nguyen SM; Chlebik AA; Olch AJ; Wong KK
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jan; 9(1):e103-e109. PubMed ID: 30017785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design of a 3D patient-specific collision avoidance virtual framework for half-gantry proton therapy system.
    Dougherty JM; Whitaker TJ; Mundy DW; Tryggestad EJ; Beltran CJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13496. PubMed ID: 34890094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Collision prediction for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery planning: An easy-to-implement analytical solution.
    Felefly T; Achkar S; Khater N; Sayah R; Fares G; Farah N; El Barouky J; Azoury F; El Khoury C; Roukoz C; Nehme Nasr D; Nasr E
    Cancer Radiother; 2020 Jul; 24(4):316-322. PubMed ID: 32467083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A collision prediction framework for noncoplanar radiotherapy planning and delivery.
    Islam N; Kilian-Meneghin J; deBoer S; Podgorsak M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 21(8):92-106. PubMed ID: 32559004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient-specific collision zones for 4π trajectory optimized radiation therapy.
    Northway C; Lincoln JD; Little B; Syme A; Thomas CG
    Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1407-1416. PubMed ID: 35023581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans.
    Breedveld S; Storchi PR; Voet PW; Heijmen BJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):951-63. PubMed ID: 22320804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Collision indicator charts for gantry-couch position combinations for Siemens ONCOR and Elekta Infinity linacs.
    Becker SJ; Culberson W; Flynn R
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 14(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 24036873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gantry and isocenter displacements of a linear accelerator caused by an add-on micromultileaf collimator.
    Riis HL; Zimmermann SJ; Hjelm-Hansen M
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031707. PubMed ID: 23464302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinically feasible method for the detection of potential collision in proton therapy.
    Zou W; Lin H; Plastaras JP; Wang H; Bui V; Vapiwala N; McDonough J; Tochner Z; Both S
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):7094-101. PubMed ID: 23127100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Collision prediction software for radiotherapy treatments.
    Padilla L; Pearson EA; Pelizzari CA
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6448-56. PubMed ID: 26520734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of beam angle selection strategies for intracranial IMRT.
    Bangert M; Ziegenhein P; Oelfke U
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011716. PubMed ID: 23298086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A derivative-free multistart framework for an automated noncoplanar beam angle optimization in IMRT.
    Rocha H; Dias J; Ventura T; Ferreira B; Lopes MD
    Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5514. PubMed ID: 27782716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lateral head flexion as a noncoplanar solution for ring gantry stereotactic radiosurgery.
    Reynoso FJ; Hugo GD; Mutic S; Gach HM; Knutson NC
    Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1181-1188. PubMed ID: 31840258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of CT cone-beam geometry using a novel method insensitive to phantom fabrication inaccuracy: implications for isocenter localization accuracy.
    Ford JC; Zheng D; Williamson JF
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2829-40. PubMed ID: 21815358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collision avoidance in computer optimized treatment planning.
    Humm JL
    Med Phys; 1994 Jul; 21(7):1053-64. PubMed ID: 7968836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clearance assurance for stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy.
    Furhang EE; Hanley J; Chiu-Tsao ST; Toner S; Fan P; Gliedman P; Harrison LB
    Med Phys; 2002 Jan; 29(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 11831572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.