155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33778671)
1. q-Space Imaging Yields a Higher Effect Gradient to Assess Cellularity than Conventional Diffusion-weighted Imaging Methods at 3.0 T: A Pilot Study with Freshly Excised Whole-Breast Tumors.
Senn N; Masannat Y; Husain E; Siow B; Heys SD; He J
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2019 Sep; 1(1):e190008. PubMed ID: 33778671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Whole-tumor histogram analysis of DWI and QSI for differentiating between meningioma and schwannoma: a pilot study.
Nagano H; Sakai K; Tazoe J; Yasuike M; Akazawa K; Yamada K
Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 37(10):694-700. PubMed ID: 31396824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast lesion characterization using whole-lesion histogram analysis with stretched-exponential diffusion model.
Liu C; Wang K; Li X; Zhang J; Ding J; Spuhler K; Duong T; Liang C; Huang C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 47(6):1701-1710. PubMed ID: 29165847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging in the differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions.
Liu W; Wei C; Bai J; Gao X; Zhou L
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():156-163. PubMed ID: 31307642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Whole-tumor histogram analysis of monoexponential and advanced diffusion-weighted imaging for sinonasal malignant tumors: Correlations with histopathologic features.
Xiao Z; Tang Z; Zhang J; Yang G; Zeng W; Luo J; Song Y; Zhang Z
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jan; 51(1):273-285. PubMed ID: 31271488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Support vector machine for breast cancer classification using diffusion-weighted MRI histogram features: Preliminary study.
Vidić I; Egnell L; Jerome NP; Teruel JR; Sjøbakk TE; Østlie A; Fjøsne HE; Bathen TF; Goa PE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1205-1216. PubMed ID: 29044896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility study of dual parametric 2D histogram analysis of breast lesions with dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI.
Chen Y; Wu B; Liu H; Wang D; Gu Y
J Transl Med; 2018 Nov; 16(1):325. PubMed ID: 30470241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diffusional kurtosis imaging in head and neck cancer: On the use of trace-weighted images to estimate indices of non-Gaussian water diffusion.
Marzi S; Minosse S; Vidiri A; Piludu F; Giannelli M
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5411-5419. PubMed ID: 30317646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusional kurtosis imaging for differentiation of additional suspicious lesions on preoperative breast MRI of patients with known breast cancer.
Park VY; Kim SG; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim MJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():199-208. PubMed ID: 31323316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast Cancer: Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging-Diagnostic Accuracy and Correlation with Clinical-Pathologic Factors.
Sun K; Chen X; Chai W; Fei X; Fu C; Yan X; Zhan Y; Chen K; Shen K; Yan F
Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 25938679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monoexponential, Biexponential, and stretched-exponential models using diffusion-weighted imaging: A quantitative differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0T.
Jin YN; Zhang Y; Cheng JL; Zheng DD; Hu Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1461-1467. PubMed ID: 30919518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.
Huang Y; Lin Y; Hu W; Ma C; Lin W; Wang Z; Liang J; Ye W; Zhao J; Wu R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):845-856. PubMed ID: 30260589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advanced Diffusion-weighted Imaging Modeling for Prostate Cancer Characterization: Correlation with Quantitative Histopathologic Tumor Tissue Composition-A Hypothesis-generating Study.
Hectors SJ; Semaan S; Song C; Lewis S; Haines GK; Tewari A; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B
Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):918-928. PubMed ID: 29117481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Grading and proliferation assessment of diffuse astrocytic tumors with monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging.
Zhang J; Chen X; Chen D; Wang Z; Li S; Zhu W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 109():188-195. PubMed ID: 30527302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visualizing non-Gaussian diffusion: clinical application of q-space imaging and diffusional kurtosis imaging of the brain and spine.
Hori M; Fukunaga I; Masutani Y; Taoka T; Kamagata K; Suzuki Y; Aoki S
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2012; 11(4):221-33. PubMed ID: 23269009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grading of Gliomas by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging.
Bai Y; Lin Y; Tian J; Shi D; Cheng J; Haacke EM; Hong X; Ma B; Zhou J; Wang M
Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):496-504. PubMed ID: 26230975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of breast tumors.
Li T; Yu T; Li L; Lu L; Zhuo Y; Lian J; Xiong Y; Kong D; Li K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1358-1366. PubMed ID: 29717790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging of Invasive Breast Cancer: Correlations With Prognostic Factors and Molecular Subtypes.
Kang HS; Kim JY; Kim JJ; Kim S; Lee NK; Lee JW; Suh HB; Hwangbo L; Son Y; Grimm R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jul; 56(1):110-120. PubMed ID: 34792837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tumor apparent diffusion coefficient as an imaging biomarker to predict tumor aggressiveness in patients with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.
Shin HJ; Kim SH; Lee HJ; Gong G; Baek S; Chae EY; Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH
NMR Biomed; 2016 Aug; 29(8):1070-8. PubMed ID: 27332719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
