147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33778756)
1. Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity and Other Quantitative
Gopal A; Xi Y; Subramaniam RM; Pinho DF
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2021 Jan; 3(1):e200022. PubMed ID: 33778756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Value of Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity and Quantitative
Pinho DF; King B; Xi Y; Albuquerque K; Lea J; Subramaniam RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):908-916. PubMed ID: 32069078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Texture analysis of
Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Nakabeppu Y; Nakajo M; Higashi R; Fukukura Y; Sasaki K; Uchikado Y; Natsugoe S; Yoshiura T
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Feb; 44(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 27613542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic role of baseline
Albano D; Bosio G; Camoni L; Farina M; Re A; Tucci A; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
Hematol Oncol; 2019 Feb; 37(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30299563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of cell proliferation imaging with 4DST PET/CT for predicting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer: a comparison study with FDG PET/CT.
Hotta M; Minamimoto R; Toyohara J; Nohara K; Nakajima K; Takase K; Yamada K
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jul; 48(8):2615-2623. PubMed ID: 33438100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Hofheinz F; Li Y; Steffen IG; Lin Q; Lili C; Hua W; van den Hoff J; Zschaeck S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1485-1494. PubMed ID: 30949816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Prognostic Value of
Shao D; Gao Q; Cheng Y; Du DY; Wang SY; Wang SX
Korean J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 22(3):425-434. PubMed ID: 33236543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Establishment and validation of a nomogram with intratumoral heterogeneity derived from
Gu B; Zhang J; Ma G; Song S; Shi L; Zhang Y; Yang Z
BMC Cancer; 2020 Jan; 20(1):37. PubMed ID: 31941465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
Hyun SH; Choi JY; Shim YM; Kim K; Lee SJ; Cho YS; Lee JY; Lee KH; Kim BT
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19826877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic significance of semi-quantitative FDG-PET parameters in stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy.
Shrestha S; Higuchi T; Shirai K; Tokue A; Shrestha S; Saitoh JI; Hirasawa H; Ohno T; Nakano T; Tsushima Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 31758225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pretreatment quantitative
Gencturk M; Ozturk K; Koksel Y; Li F; Cayci Z
Clin Imaging; 2019; 53():17-24. PubMed ID: 30308429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metabolic parameters of sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT predict overall survival of esophageal cancer patients treated with (chemo-) radiation.
Li Y; Zschaeck S; Lin Q; Chen S; Chen L; Wu H
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Feb; 14(1):35. PubMed ID: 30782182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
Mantziari S; Pomoni A; Prior JO; Winiker M; Allemann P; Demartines N; Schäfer M
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 31969127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT metabolic parameters in patients with advanced extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma].
Wu LL; Liang JH; Wang L; Xu W; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 41(11):831-836. PubMed ID: 31770850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of Various Metabolic Parameters Derived From Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT as Prognostic Markers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.
Sharma A; Mohan A; Bhalla AS; Sharma MC; Vishnubhatla S; Das CJ; Pandey AK; Sekhar Bal C; Patel CD; Sharma P; Agarwal KK; Kumar R
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 43(1):e8-e17. PubMed ID: 29112011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of
Lee JR; Almuhaimid TM; Roh JL; Oh JS; Kim SJ; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 118(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 30132891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of Recurrence and Mortality of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Patients Using Pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT Parameters: Intratumoral Heterogeneity, SUV, and Volumetric Parameters.
Chang S; Kim SJ
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2016 Feb; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26844846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters measured by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer.
Zhu D; Ma T; Niu Z; Zheng J; Han A; Zhao S; Yu J
Lung Cancer; 2011 Sep; 73(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 21292341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters measured by
Chang H; Lee SJ; Lim J; Lee JS; Kim YJ; Lee WW
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 May; 145(5):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 30900157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
