These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33778942)

  • 1. The influence of mandibular divergence on facial soft tissue thickness in class I patients: a cephalometric study.
    Perović TM; Blažej M; Jovanović I
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2022; 81(2):472-480. PubMed ID: 33778942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison Of Soft Tissue Chin And Lower Lip Thickness In Adult Patients With Various Mandibular Divergence Patterns.
    Farooq A; Afsar M; Khan VA; Shahnawaz A; Hafeez SD; Shad S; Afsar F
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2023; 35(2):226-230. PubMed ID: 37422810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Chin Thickness in Adult Patients with Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Various Vertical Growth Patterns: a Cephalometric Study.
    Patil HS; Golwalkar S; Chougule K; Kulkarni NR
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2021 Feb; 63(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 33650399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Soft and hard tissue changes of hyperdivergent class Ⅱ patients before and after orthodontic extraction treatment].
    Mao B; Tian Y; Wang X; Li J; Zhou Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Feb; 56(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 38318905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cephalometric analysis of the soft tissue profile in Hunan Han adults with normal occlusion].
    Zhou S; Ou P; Yu M; Guo X; Shao C; He L; Su H
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Apr; 40(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 25931229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Network analysis of three-dimensional hard-soft tissue relationships in the lower 1/3 of the face: skeletal Class I-normodivergent malocclusion versus Class II-hyperdivergent malocclusion.
    Wang T; Nie K; Fan Y; Chen G; Xu K; Han B; Pei Y; Song G; Xu T
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):996. PubMed ID: 39182104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment and Evaluation of Soft Tissue Measurements between Various Mandibular Divergences in the South Indian Population: A Cephalometric Study.
    Kumar AA; Parthiban P; Kumar SS; Divakar G; Sekar SS; Silambu MR
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(Suppl 1):S152-S155. PubMed ID: 36110831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial soft tissue thickness differences among different vertical facial patterns.
    Saadeh M; Fayyad-Kazan H; Haddad R; Ayoub F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110468. PubMed ID: 32971443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparisons of soft tissue chin thickness in adult patients with various mandibular divergence patterns.
    Macari AT; Hanna AE
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):708-14. PubMed ID: 24188123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of various nasal shapes and angles in different vertical growth patterns - A Cephalometric Study.
    Perović T; Blažej Z; Jovanović I
    Anthropol Anz; 2023 Mar; 80(2):159-170. PubMed ID: 36752663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Male and Female Characteristics of Facial Soft Tissue Thickness in Different Orthodontic Malocclusions Evaluated by Cephalometric Radiography.
    Perović T; Blažej Z
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 May; 24():3415-3424. PubMed ID: 29791323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between jaw divergence and facial soft tissue dimensions.
    Rongo R; Antoun JS; Lim YX; Dias G; Valletta R; Farella M
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):788-94. PubMed ID: 24559507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of soft tissue chin thickness at different levels of chin in subjects with various growth patterns.
    Sodawala J; Akolkar A; Sodawala F; Gandhi S; Hamdani S; Ali SM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(2):224-228. PubMed ID: 32436901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms for the Lambada population in Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh.
    Thomas M; Reddy VD; Lakshmi HV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 23059572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating the postoperative soft tissue changes in different vertical facial divergent patients with mandibular prognathism.
    Tseng YC; Wu TY; Lu CY; Chou ST; Lin SH; Chen CM
    J Dent Sci; 2024 Jul; 19(3):1443-1451. PubMed ID: 39035289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation Between Cephalometric Values and Soft Tissue Profile in Class I and Class II Adult Patients based on Vertical Patterns.
    Farha P; Arqub SA; Ghoussoub MS
    Turk J Orthod; 2024 Mar; 37(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 38556951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissues in hyperdivergent skeletal class II females in Guangdong.
    Zhang X; Zheng J; Deng J; Wen Z; Chen Z; Gan L; Wu L
    BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):56. PubMed ID: 35351027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of the vertical facial pattern on the developmental relationship between the nasal bone and maxillary central incisors.
    Shi J; Al-Ak'hali MS; Cai D; Guo Q; Cao Y; Alhammadi MS; Mashrah MA; Yang Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):211. PubMed ID: 37046239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
    Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.