166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33778942)
1. The influence of mandibular divergence on facial soft tissue thickness in class I patients: a cephalometric study.
Perović TM; Blažej M; Jovanović I
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2022; 81(2):472-480. PubMed ID: 33778942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison Of Soft Tissue Chin And Lower Lip Thickness In Adult Patients With Various Mandibular Divergence Patterns.
Farooq A; Afsar M; Khan VA; Shahnawaz A; Hafeez SD; Shad S; Afsar F
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2023; 35(2):226-230. PubMed ID: 37422810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Chin Thickness in Adult Patients with Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Various Vertical Growth Patterns: a Cephalometric Study.
Patil HS; Golwalkar S; Chougule K; Kulkarni NR
Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2021 Feb; 63(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 33650399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Soft and hard tissue changes of hyperdivergent class Ⅱ patients before and after orthodontic extraction treatment].
Mao B; Tian Y; Wang X; Li J; Zhou Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Feb; 56(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 38318905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cephalometric analysis of the soft tissue profile in Hunan Han adults with normal occlusion].
Zhou S; Ou P; Yu M; Guo X; Shao C; He L; Su H
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Apr; 40(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 25931229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment and Evaluation of Soft Tissue Measurements between Various Mandibular Divergences in the South Indian Population: A Cephalometric Study.
Kumar AA; Parthiban P; Kumar SS; Divakar G; Sekar SS; Silambu MR
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(Suppl 1):S152-S155. PubMed ID: 36110831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Facial soft tissue thickness differences among different vertical facial patterns.
Saadeh M; Fayyad-Kazan H; Haddad R; Ayoub F
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110468. PubMed ID: 32971443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparisons of soft tissue chin thickness in adult patients with various mandibular divergence patterns.
Macari AT; Hanna AE
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):708-14. PubMed ID: 24188123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of various nasal shapes and angles in different vertical growth patterns - A Cephalometric Study.
Perović T; Blažej Z; Jovanović I
Anthropol Anz; 2023 Mar; 80(2):159-170. PubMed ID: 36752663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Male and Female Characteristics of Facial Soft Tissue Thickness in Different Orthodontic Malocclusions Evaluated by Cephalometric Radiography.
Perović T; Blažej Z
Med Sci Monit; 2018 May; 24():3415-3424. PubMed ID: 29791323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between jaw divergence and facial soft tissue dimensions.
Rongo R; Antoun JS; Lim YX; Dias G; Valletta R; Farella M
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):788-94. PubMed ID: 24559507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of soft tissue chin thickness at different levels of chin in subjects with various growth patterns.
Sodawala J; Akolkar A; Sodawala F; Gandhi S; Hamdani S; Ali SM
Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(2):224-228. PubMed ID: 32436901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms for the Lambada population in Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh.
Thomas M; Reddy VD; Lakshmi HV
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 23059572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation Between Cephalometric Values and Soft Tissue Profile in Class I and Class II Adult Patients based on Vertical Patterns.
Farha P; Arqub SA; Ghoussoub MS
Turk J Orthod; 2024 Mar; 37(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 38556951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissues in hyperdivergent skeletal class II females in Guangdong.
Zhang X; Zheng J; Deng J; Wen Z; Chen Z; Gan L; Wu L
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):56. PubMed ID: 35351027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of the vertical facial pattern on the developmental relationship between the nasal bone and maxillary central incisors.
Shi J; Al-Ak'hali MS; Cai D; Guo Q; Cao Y; Alhammadi MS; Mashrah MA; Yang Y
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):211. PubMed ID: 37046239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Soft-tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy.
Gjørup H; Athanasiou AE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):312-23. PubMed ID: 1927981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
