These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33779166)

  • 1. Reliable and Accurate Solution to the Induced Fit Docking Problem for Protein-Ligand Binding.
    Miller EB; Murphy RB; Sindhikara D; Borrelli KW; Grisewood MJ; Ranalli F; Dixon SL; Jerome S; Boyles NA; Day T; Ghanakota P; Mondal S; Rafi SB; Troast DM; Abel R; Friesner RA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Apr; 17(4):2630-2639. PubMed ID: 33779166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CHARMM-GUI-Based Induced Fit Docking Workflow to Generate Reliable Protein-Ligand Binding Modes.
    Guterres H; Im W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Aug; 63(15):4772-4779. PubMed ID: 37462607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Poses via a Combination of Induced Fit Docking and Metadynamics Simulations.
    Clark AJ; Tiwary P; Borrelli K; Feng S; Miller EB; Abel R; Friesner RA; Berne BJ
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Jun; 12(6):2990-8. PubMed ID: 27145262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pharmacophore development, drug-likeness analysis, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations for identification of new CK2 inhibitors.
    Hammad S; Bouaziz-Terrachet S; Meghnem R; Meziane D
    J Mol Model; 2020 May; 26(6):160. PubMed ID: 32472293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is It Reliable to Take the Molecular Docking Top Scoring Position as the Best Solution without Considering Available Structural Data?
    Ramírez D; Caballero J
    Molecules; 2018 Apr; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 29710787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protein structure-based drug design: from docking to molecular dynamics.
    Śledź P; Caflisch A
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2018 Feb; 48():93-102. PubMed ID: 29149726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects.
    Sherman W; Day T; Jacobson MP; Friesner RA; Farid R
    J Med Chem; 2006 Jan; 49(2):534-53. PubMed ID: 16420040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advancements in Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations Towards Ligand-receptor Interactions and Structure-function Relationships.
    Naqvi AAT; Mohammad T; Hasan GM; Hassan MI
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2018; 18(20):1755-1768. PubMed ID: 30360721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ph4Dock: pharmacophore-based protein-ligand docking.
    Goto J; Kataoka R; Hirayama N
    J Med Chem; 2004 Dec; 47(27):6804-11. PubMed ID: 15615529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CDOCKER and λ-dynamics for prospective prediction in D₃R Grand Challenge 2.
    Ding X; Hayes RL; Vilseck JZ; Charles MK; Brooks CL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 28884249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of potential PKC inhibitors through pharmacophore designing, 3D-QSAR and molecular dynamics simulations targeting Alzheimer's disease.
    Iqbal S; Anantha Krishnan D; Gunasekaran K
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2018 Nov; 36(15):4029-4044. PubMed ID: 29182053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molecular Dynamics in Mixed Solvents Reveals Protein-Ligand Interactions, Improves Docking, and Allows Accurate Binding Free Energy Predictions.
    Arcon JP; Defelipe LA; Modenutti CP; López ED; Alvarez-Garcia D; Barril X; Turjanski AG; Martí MA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Apr; 57(4):846-863. PubMed ID: 28318252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A reinforcement learning approach for protein-ligand binding pose prediction.
    Wang C; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Li K; Lin M; Pan F; Wu W; Zhang J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 23(1):368. PubMed ID: 36076158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of Docking-Based Virtual Screening for GPCR Ligands with Homology Modeled Structures: A Case Study of the Angiotensin II Type I Receptor.
    Chen H; Fu W; Wang Z; Wang X; Lei T; Zhu F; Li D; Chang S; Xu L; Hou T
    ACS Chem Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 10(1):677-689. PubMed ID: 30265513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Santos LHS; Ferreira RS; Caffarena ER
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():13-34. PubMed ID: 31452096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
    Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discovery of Novel DPP-IV Inhibitors as Potential Candidates for the Treatment of Type 2
    Musoev A; Numonov S; You Z; Gao H
    Molecules; 2019 Aug; 24(16):. PubMed ID: 31394858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the Stability of Ligand Binding Modes to Proteins by Molecular Dynamics Simulations: A Cross-docking Study.
    Liu K; Kokubo H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Oct; 57(10):2514-2522. PubMed ID: 28902511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.