These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33779195)

  • 1. Public support for sentencing reform: A policy-capturing experiment.
    Vardsveen TC; Wiener RL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):430-446. PubMed ID: 33779195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Justification of Sentencing Decisions: Development of a Ratio-Based Measure Tested on Child Neglect Cases.
    Watamura E; Ioku T; Wakebe T
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():761536. PubMed ID: 35095646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cooperative guardian offenders and sentencing outcomes: Evidence from criminal sentencing documents of child trafficking crime in China.
    Xin Y; Cai T
    Child Abuse Negl; 2022 Feb; 124():105449. PubMed ID: 34922261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crime and punishment in Saudi Arabia: Lashing, imprisonment, and other unusual punishments.
    Boateng FD; Pryce DK; Alotaibi HA
    Child Abuse Negl; 2023 Jan; 135():105948. PubMed ID: 36395699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The animal in you: animalistic descriptions of a violent crime increase punishment of perpetrator.
    Vasquez EA; Loughnan S; Gootjes-Dreesbach E; Weger U
    Aggress Behav; 2014; 40(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 24452531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Life-sentenced juveniles: Public perceptions of risk and need for incarceration.
    Heilbrun K; Durham K; Thornewill A; Schiedel R; Pietruszka V; Phillips S; Locklair B; Thomas J
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Sep; 36(5):587-596. PubMed ID: 30298613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Punishment as a scarce resource: a potential policy intervention for managing incarceration rates.
    Aharoni E; Nahmias E; Hoffman MB; Fernandes S
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1157460. PubMed ID: 37213354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Moral concerns, criminal punishment, and whether offenders in general or individual offenders are being considered.
    Brubacher MR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Mar; 25(1):129-147. PubMed ID: 30489126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring Attitudes About Hate: Development of the Hate Crime Beliefs Scale.
    Cabeldue MK; Cramer RJ; Kehn A; Crosby JW; Anastasi JS
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 Dec; 33(23):3656-3685. PubMed ID: 26951607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The trial tax and the intersection of race/ethnicity, gender, and age in criminal court sentencing.
    Lehmann PS
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):201-216. PubMed ID: 36931858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between victim impact statements and judicial decision making: An archival analysis of sentencing outcomes.
    Dufour GK; Ternes M; Stinson V
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Aug; 47(4):484-498. PubMed ID: 37347897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft on crime: Patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex damage allocate reduced third-party punishment to violent criminals.
    Asp EW; Gullickson JT; Warner KA; Koscik TR; Denburg NL; Tranel D
    Cortex; 2019 Oct; 119():33-45. PubMed ID: 31071555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Some sex differences in sentencing severity for a mock crime scenario.
    McKelvie SJ
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Jun; 100(3 Pt 1):894-6. PubMed ID: 17688108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fight, flight, and free will: The effect of trauma informed psychoeducation on perceived culpability and punishment for juvenile and adult offenders.
    Katz RR; Fondacaro MR
    Behav Sci Law; 2021 Dec; 39(6):708-730. PubMed ID: 34626002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing sentencing judgments of judges and laypeople: The role of justifications.
    Watamura E; Ioku T
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277939. PubMed ID: 36409707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sentencing, severity, and social norms: a rank-based model of contextual influence on judgments of crimes and punishments.
    Aldrovandi S; Wood AM; Brown GD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):538-47. PubMed ID: 24140821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When punishment goals moderate and mediate the effect of clinical reports on the recidivism risk on prison sentences.
    Niang A; Leclerc C; Testé B
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(4):531-545. PubMed ID: 35558147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judging the goring ox: retribution directed toward animals.
    Goodwin GP; Benforado A
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Apr; 39(3):619-46. PubMed ID: 25256421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Justice at any cost? The impact of cost-benefit salience on criminal punishment judgments.
    Aharoni E; Kleider-Offutt HM; Brosnan SF; Watzek J
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):38-60. PubMed ID: 30474239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does "Jamal" receive a harsher sentence than "James"? First-name bias in the criminal sentencing of Black men.
    Kenthirarajah DT; Camp NP; Walton GM; Kay AC; Cohen GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):169-181. PubMed ID: 36931856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.