These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33779195)
21. Genetic essentialist beliefs about criminality predict harshness of recommended punishment. Meyer M; Dolins FL; Grijalva Y; Gelman SA J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Dec; 151(12):3230-3248. PubMed ID: 35758988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Defendants' age and severity of punishment for two crimes in a mock scenario: further data. McKelvie SJ; Bergeron CE Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):621-4. PubMed ID: 14620251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice. Bastian B; Denson TF; Haslam N PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61842. PubMed ID: 23626737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cast into doubt: Free will and the justification for punishment. Koppel S; Fondacaro M; Na C Behav Sci Law; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30004135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The eye of the beholder: Increased likelihood of prison sentences for people perceived to have Hispanic ethnicity. Girvan EJ; Marek H Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):182-200. PubMed ID: 36931857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The importance of forensic evidence for decisions on criminal guilt. Ling S; Kaplan J; Berryessa CM Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 33736846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Cross-Cultural Study of Punishment Beliefs and Decisions. Zhang Y; Chen C; Greenberger E; Knowles ED Psychol Rep; 2017 Feb; 120(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 27932602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effects of essentialist thinking toward biosocial risk factors for criminality and types of offending on lay punishment support. Berryessa CM Behav Sci Law; 2020 Jul; 38(4):355-380. PubMed ID: 32754930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Children endorse deterrence motivations for third-party punishment but derive higher enjoyment from compensating victims. Arini RL; Mahmood M; Bocarejo Aljure J; Ingram GPD; Wiggs L; Kenward B J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 Jun; 230():105630. PubMed ID: 36731278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Short- and long-term effects of imprisonment on future felony convictions and prison admissions. Harding DJ; Morenoff JD; Nguyen AP; Bushway SD Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(42):11103-11108. PubMed ID: 28973924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Crime and punishment: Morality judgment in a foreign language. Woumans E; Van der Cruyssen I; Duyck W J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Aug; 149(8):1597-1602. PubMed ID: 31928022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Moral duty and equalization concerns motivate children's third-party punishment. Arini RL; Wiggs L; Kenward B Dev Psychol; 2021 Aug; 57(8):1325-1341. PubMed ID: 34591575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Crime and punishment: distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cushman F Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):353-80. PubMed ID: 18439575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Balancing punishment and compassion for seriously ill prisoners. Williams BA; Sudore RL; Greifinger R; Morrison RS Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 21628351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prison break: Karl Menninger's The Crime of Punishment and its reception in U.S. psychology. Devonis DC; Triggs J Hist Psychol; 2017 Feb; 20(1):92-121. PubMed ID: 27918186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The psychopathic "label" and effects on punishment outcomes: A meta-analysis. Berryessa CM; Wohlstetter B Law Hum Behav; 2019 Feb; 43(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 30570278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Indefinite detention or supervision for public protection when a life sentence is not available: Pathway outcomes among prisoners in one region. Crosswaite S; Freestone M; Ramsden J Crim Behav Ment Health; 2020 Jun; 30(2-3):95-104. PubMed ID: 32383313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Retribution as hierarchy regulation: Hierarchy preferences moderate the effect of offender socioeconomic status on support for retribution. Redford L; Ratliff KA Br J Soc Psychol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):75-94. PubMed ID: 28921582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evidence-based sentencing: Public openness and opposition to using gender, age, and race as risk factors for recidivism. Scurich N; Monahan J Law Hum Behav; 2016 Feb; 40(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 26390055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]