These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33779833)

  • 1. Reduced flexibility of cognitive control: reactive, but not proactive control, underpins the congruency sequence effect.
    Yang Q; Pourtois G
    Psychol Res; 2022 Mar; 86(2):474-484. PubMed ID: 33779833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reappraising cognitive control: normal reactive adjustments following conflict processing are abolished by proactive emotion regulation.
    Yang Q; Notebaert W; Pourtois G
    Psychol Res; 2019 Feb; 83(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 30244285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Koob V; Mackenzie I; Ulrich R; Leuthold H; Janczyk M
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101528. PubMed ID: 36584549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The selective use of punishments on congruent versus incongruent trials in the Stroop task.
    Yang Q; Xing J; Braem S; Pourtois G
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2022 Sep; 193():107654. PubMed ID: 35777632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Control in context: The theta rhythm provides evidence for reactive control but no evidence for proactive control.
    Mendl J; Banerjee S; Fischer R; Dreisbach G; Köster M
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Oct; 61(10):e14625. PubMed ID: 38837767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-task congruency sequence effect without the contribution of multiple expectancy.
    Lim CE; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Mar; 214():103268. PubMed ID: 33609972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks.
    Erb CD; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102869. PubMed ID: 31228719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Going, going, gone? Proactive control prevents the congruency sequence effect from rapid decay.
    Duthoo W; Abrahamse EL; Braem S; Notebaert W
    Psychol Res; 2014 Jul; 78(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 24077774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The congruency sequence effect 3.0: a critical test of conflict adaptation.
    Duthoo W; Abrahamse EL; Braem S; Boehler CN; Notebaert W
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110462. PubMed ID: 25340396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Both congruent and incongruent trials drive the congruency sequence effect: Novel support for an episodic retrieval view of adaptive control in the prime-probe task.
    Dunaway MG; Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38647457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The next trial will be conflicting! Effects of explicit congruency pre-cues on cognitive control.
    Bugg JM; Smallwood A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jan; 80(1):16-33. PubMed ID: 25522873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of conflict in cognitive control: Evidence from mouse tracking.
    Ye W; Damian MF
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jan; 76(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 35045771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissociation of Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control in Individuals with Schizotypy: An Event-Related Potential Study.
    Jia LX; Qin XJ; Cui JF; Shi HS; Ye JY; Yang TX; Wang Y; Chan RCK
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2021 Nov; 27(10):981-991. PubMed ID: 33509315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motivational and cognitive determinants of control during conflict processing.
    Soutschek A; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(6):1076-89. PubMed ID: 24344784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A diffusion model for the congruency sequence effect.
    Luo C; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2034-2051. PubMed ID: 35676612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.
    Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):945-967. PubMed ID: 31580121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the reliability of behavioral measures of cognitive control: retest reliability of task-inhibition effect, task-preparation effect, Stroop-like interference, and conflict adaptation effect.
    Schuch S; Philipp AM; Maulitz L; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2022 Oct; 86(7):2158-2184. PubMed ID: 34921344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Associative priming and conflict differentially affect two processes underlying cognitive control: Evidence from reaching behavior.
    Erb CD; McBride AG; Marcovitch S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1400-1410. PubMed ID: 30859477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ERPs dissociate proactive and reactive control: evidence from a task-switching paradigm with informative and uninformative cues.
    Czernochowski D
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 15(1):117-31. PubMed ID: 24925001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modality-specific neural mechanisms of cognitive control in a Stroop-like task.
    Li Z; Yang G; Wu H; Li Q; Xu H; Göschl F; Nolte G; Liu X
    Brain Cogn; 2021 Feb; 147():105662. PubMed ID: 33360042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.