These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33779888)

  • 1. Computational Models in Electroencephalography.
    Glomb K; Cabral J; Cattani A; Mazzoni A; Raj A; Franceschiello B
    Brain Topogr; 2022 Jan; 35(1):142-161. PubMed ID: 33779888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human Neocortical Neurosolver (HNN), a new software tool for interpreting the cellular and network origin of human MEG/EEG data.
    Neymotin SA; Daniels DS; Caldwell B; McDougal RA; Carnevale NT; Jas M; Moore CI; Hines ML; Hämäläinen M; Jones SR
    Elife; 2020 Jan; 9():. PubMed ID: 31967544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recording human electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals for neuroscientific research and real-time functional cortical mapping.
    Hill NJ; Gupta D; Brunner P; Gunduz A; Adamo MA; Ritaccio A; Schalk G
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Jun; (64):. PubMed ID: 22782131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A realistic, accurate and fast source modeling approach for the EEG forward problem.
    Miinalainen T; Rezaei A; Us D; Nüßing A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Pursiainen S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():56-67. PubMed ID: 30165251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanisms of Neurofeedback: A Computation-theoretic Approach.
    Davelaar EJ
    Neuroscience; 2018 May; 378():175-188. PubMed ID: 28596116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study.
    Bénar CG; Grova C; Jirsa VK; Lina JM
    J Comput Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 47(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 31292816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mean-field thalamocortical modeling of longitudinal EEG acquired during intensive meditation training.
    Saggar M; Zanesco AP; King BG; Bridwell DA; MacLean KA; Aichele SR; Jacobs TL; Wallace BA; Saron CD; Miikkulainen R
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jul; 114():88-104. PubMed ID: 25862265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inferring multi-scale neural mechanisms with brain network modelling.
    Schirner M; McIntosh AR; Jirsa V; Deco G; Ritter P
    Elife; 2018 Jan; 7():. PubMed ID: 29308767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decoding subjective emotional arousal from EEG during an immersive virtual reality experience.
    Hofmann SM; Klotzsche F; Mariola A; Nikulin V; Villringer A; Gaebler M
    Elife; 2021 Oct; 10():. PubMed ID: 34708689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial neuronal synchronization and the waveform of oscillations: Implications for EEG and MEG.
    Schaworonkow N; Nikulin VV
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 May; 15(5):e1007055. PubMed ID: 31086368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Joint EEG/fMRI state space model for the detection of directed interactions in human brains--a simulation study.
    Lenz M; Musso M; Linke Y; Tüscher O; Timmer J; Weiller C; Schelter B
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Nov; 32(11):1725-36. PubMed ID: 22027197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of the effective and functional human cortical connectivity with structural equation modeling and directed transfer function applied to high-resolution EEG.
    Astolfi L; Cincotti F; Mattia D; Salinari S; Babiloni C; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Ding L; Ni Y; He B; Marciani MG; Babiloni F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1457-70. PubMed ID: 15707795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An automated pipeline for constructing personalized virtual brains from multimodal neuroimaging data.
    Schirner M; Rothmeier S; Jirsa VK; McIntosh AR; Ritter P
    Neuroimage; 2015 Aug; 117():343-57. PubMed ID: 25837600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Collective almost synchronization-based model to extract and predict features of EEG signals.
    Nguyen PTM; Hayashi Y; Baptista MDS; Kondo T
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16342. PubMed ID: 33004963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electroencephalography.
    Biasiucci A; Franceschiello B; Murray MM
    Curr Biol; 2019 Feb; 29(3):R80-R85. PubMed ID: 30721678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A computational model of mild traumatic brain injury.
    Menon JP; Gupta V; Aravamudhan R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():1354-7. PubMed ID: 23366150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Field Spread on Resting-State Magneto Encephalography Functional Network Analysis: A Computational Modeling Study.
    Silva Pereira S; Hindriks R; Mühlberg S; Maris E; van Ede F; Griffa A; Hagmann P; Deco G
    Brain Connect; 2017 Nov; 7(9):541-557. PubMed ID: 28875718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling and detecting deep brain activity with MEG & EEG.
    Attal Y; Bhattacharjee M; Yelnik J; Cottereau B; Lefèvre J; Okada Y; Bardinet E; Chupin M; Baillet S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4937-40. PubMed ID: 18003114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biophysically detailed forward modeling of the neural origin of EEG and MEG signals.
    Næss S; Halnes G; Hagen E; Hagler DJ; Dale AM; Einevoll GT; Ness TV
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 225():117467. PubMed ID: 33075556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.