These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. eDNA sampled from stream networks correlates with camera trap detection rates of terrestrial mammals. Lyet A; Pellissier L; Valentini A; Dejean T; Hehmeyer A; Naidoo R Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):11362. PubMed ID: 34131168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carrion fly-derived DNA metabarcoding is an effective tool for mammal surveys: Evidence from a known tropical mammal community. Rodgers TW; Xu CCY; Giacalone J; Kapheim KM; Saltonstall K; Vargas M; Yu DW; Somervuo P; McMillan WO; Jansen PA Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):e133-e145. PubMed ID: 28758342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of eDNA to camera trapping for assessment of terrestrial mammal diversity. Leempoel K; Hebert T; Hadly EA Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jan; 287(1918):20192353. PubMed ID: 31937227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Field calibration of blowfly-derived DNA against traditional methods for assessing mammal diversity in tropical forests. Lee PS; Gan HM; Clements GR; Wilson JJ Genome; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1008-1022. PubMed ID: 27696907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of soil eDNA to camera traps for assessing mammal and bird community composition and site use. Tetzlaff SJ; Katz AD; Wolff PJ; Kleitch ME Ecol Evol; 2024 Jul; 14(7):e70022. PubMed ID: 39011132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mapping differences in mammalian distributions and diversity using environmental DNA from rivers. Broadhurst HA; Gregory LM; Bleakley EK; Perkins JC; Lavin JV; Bolton P; Browett SS; Howe CV; Singleton N; Tansley D; Sales NG; McDevitt AD Sci Total Environ; 2021 Dec; 801():149724. PubMed ID: 34467903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Capturing open ocean biodiversity: Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding to the continuous plankton recorder. Suter L; Polanowski AM; Clarke LJ; Kitchener JA; Deagle BE Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3140-3157. PubMed ID: 32767849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot. Valdivia-Carrillo T; Rocha-Olivares A; Reyes-Bonilla H; Domínguez-Contreras JF; Munguia-Vega A Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Jul; 21(5):1558-1574. PubMed ID: 33683812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sampling environmental DNA from trees and soil to detect cryptic arboreal mammals. Allen MC; Kwait R; Vastano A; Kisurin A; Zoccolo I; Jaffe BD; Angle JC; Maslo B; Lockwood JL Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):180. PubMed ID: 36604526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods. Hänfling B; Lawson Handley L; Read DS; Hahn C; Li J; Nichols P; Blackman RC; Oliver A; Winfield IJ Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3101-19. PubMed ID: 27095076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Terrestrial mammal surveillance using hybridization capture of environmental DNA from African waterholes. Seeber PA; McEwen GK; Löber U; Förster DW; East ML; Melzheimer J; Greenwood AD Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Nov; 19(6):1486-1496. PubMed ID: 31349392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Airborne environmental DNA for terrestrial vertebrate community monitoring. Lynggaard C; Bertelsen MF; Jensen CV; Johnson MS; Frøslev TG; Olsen MT; Bohmann K Curr Biol; 2022 Feb; 32(3):701-707.e5. PubMed ID: 34995490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using vertebrate environmental DNA from seawater in biomonitoring of marine habitats. Sigsgaard EE; Torquato F; Frøslev TG; Moore ABM; Sørensen JM; Range P; Ben-Hamadou R; Bach SS; Møller PR; Thomsen PF Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 31729081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental DNA enables detection of terrestrial mammals from forest pond water. Ushio M; Fukuda H; Inoue T; Makoto K; Kishida O; Sato K; Murata K; Nikaido M; Sado T; Sato Y; Takeshita M; Iwasaki W; Yamanaka H; Kondoh M; Miya M Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):e63-e75. PubMed ID: 28603873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Airborne environmental DNA captures terrestrial vertebrate diversity in nature. Lynggaard C; Frøslev TG; Johnson MS; Olsen MT; Bohmann K Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jan; 24(1):e13840. PubMed ID: 37497670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing and optimizing metabarcoding of iDNA from dung beetles to sample mammals in the hyperdiverse Neotropics. Saranholi BH; França FM; Vogler AP; Barlow J; Vaz de Mello FZ; Maldaner ME; Carvalho E; Gestich CC; Howes B; Banks-Leite C; Galetti PM Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jul; 24(5):e13961. PubMed ID: 38646932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. eDNA metabarcoding: a promising method for anuran surveys in highly diverse tropical forests. Lopes CM; Sasso T; Valentini A; Dejean T; Martins M; Zamudio KR; Haddad CFB Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Sep; 17(5):904-914. PubMed ID: 27987263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accumulation curves of environmental DNA sequences predict coastal fish diversity in the coral triangle. Juhel JB; Utama RS; Marques V; Vimono IB; Sugeha HY; Kadarusman ; Pouyaud L; Dejean T; Mouillot D; Hocdé R Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jul; 287(1930):20200248. PubMed ID: 32635874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]