These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33780871)

  • 21. Emerging markets for imported beef in China: Results from a consumer choice experiment in Beijing.
    Ortega DL; Hong SJ; Wang HH; Wu L
    Meat Sci; 2016 Nov; 121():317-323. PubMed ID: 27395825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts.
    Scozzafava G; Corsi AM; Casini L; Contini C; Loose SM
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():70-79. PubMed ID: 26363423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is production system a relevant attribute in consumers' food preferences? The case of Iberian dry-cured ham in Spain.
    Díaz-Caro C; García-Torres S; Elghannam A; Tejerina D; Mesias FJ; Ortiz A
    Meat Sci; 2019 Dec; 158():107908. PubMed ID: 31446367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Environmental aspects of ethical animal production.
    Siegford JM; Powers W; Grimes-Casey HG
    Poult Sci; 2008 Feb; 87(2):380-6. PubMed ID: 18212385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Swiss consumers' willingness to pay and attitudes regarding dual-purpose poultry and eggs.
    Gangnat IDM; Mueller S; Kreuzer M; Messikommer RE; Siegrist M; Visschers VHM
    Poult Sci; 2018 Mar; 97(3):1089-1098. PubMed ID: 29351665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Understanding Consumer Preferences for Attributes of Yak Meat: Implications for Economic Growth and Resource Efficiency in Pastoral Areas.
    Ai Y; Yuan R; Jin S; Lin W; Zhang Y
    Meat Sci; 2024 Oct; 216():109586. PubMed ID: 38972104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Meat the challenge: Segmentation and profiling of Japanese beef mince and its substitutes consumers.
    Washio T; Saijo M; Ito H; Takeda KI; Ohashi T
    Meat Sci; 2023 Mar; 197():109047. PubMed ID: 36469985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. US respondents' willingness to pay for Cheddar cheese from dairy cattle with different pasture access, antibiotic use, and dehorning practices.
    Bir C; Widmar NO; Thompson NM; Townsend J; Wolf CA
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Apr; 103(4):3234-3249. PubMed ID: 32008783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consumers' preferences for freezing of meat to prevent toxoplasmosis- A stated preference approach.
    Lambooij MS; Veldwijk J; van Gils P; Mangen MJ; Over E; Suijkerbuijk A; Polder J; de Wit GA; Opsteegh M
    Meat Sci; 2019 Mar; 149():1-8. PubMed ID: 30448472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intensive vs. free-range organic beef. A preference study through consumer liking and conjoint analysis.
    García-Torres S; López-Gajardo A; Mesías FJ
    Meat Sci; 2016 Apr; 114():114-120. PubMed ID: 26771143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consumer preferences for and beliefs about slow growth chicken.
    Lusk JL
    Poult Sci; 2018 Dec; 97(12):4159-4166. PubMed ID: 30085249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Beef quality labels: A combination of sensory acceptance test, stated willingness to pay, and choice-based conjoint analysis.
    Meyerding SGH; Gentz M; Altmann B; Meier-Dinkel L
    Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():324-333. PubMed ID: 29792892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers.
    Slade P
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():428-437. PubMed ID: 29501683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Consumer preferences for alternatives to chick culling in Germany.
    Reithmayer C; Mußhoff O
    Poult Sci; 2019 Oct; 98(10):4539-4548. PubMed ID: 31162613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Fish Products with Health and Environmental Labels: Evidence from Five European Countries.
    Menozzi D; Nguyen TT; Sogari G; Taskov D; Lucas S; Castro-Rial JLS; Mora C
    Nutrients; 2020 Aug; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 32878105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for beef based on color and price discounts.
    Thies AJ; Altmann BA; Countryman AM; Smith C; Nair MN
    Meat Sci; 2024 Jul; 217():109597. PubMed ID: 39024701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of hedonic evaluation on consumers' preferences for beef attributes including its enrichment with n-3 and CLA fatty acids.
    Baba Y; Kallas Z; Costa-Font M; Gil JM; Realini CE
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jan; 111():9-17. PubMed ID: 26331961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Functional or constructive attitudes: Which type drives consumers' evaluation of meat products?
    Hamlin R
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jul; 117():97-107. PubMed ID: 26970290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Transparency of the meat chain in the light of food culture and history.
    Hoogland CT; de Boer J; Boersema JJ
    Appetite; 2005 Aug; 45(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 15949870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Willingness to pay and moral stance: The case of farm animal welfare in Germany.
    Frey UJ; Pirscher F
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202193. PubMed ID: 30106999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.