These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33781616)

  • 21. Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology.
    Lawlor DA; Harbord RM; Sterne JA; Timpson N; Davey Smith G
    Stat Med; 2008 Apr; 27(8):1133-63. PubMed ID: 17886233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Methodological challenges in mendelian randomization.
    VanderWeele TJ; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Cornelis M; Kraft P
    Epidemiology; 2014 May; 25(3):427-35. PubMed ID: 24681576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An Overview of Methods and Exemplars of the Use of Mendelian Randomisation in Nutritional Research.
    Bennett DA; Du H
    Nutrients; 2022 Aug; 14(16):. PubMed ID: 36014914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference.
    Didelez V; Sheehan N
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2007 Aug; 16(4):309-30. PubMed ID: 17715159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings.
    Sanderson E; Davey Smith G; Windmeijer F; Bowden J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 48(3):713-727. PubMed ID: 30535378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data.
    Burgess S; Butterworth A; Thompson SG
    Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 37(7):658-65. PubMed ID: 24114802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mendelian randomization: use of genetics to enable causal inference in observational studies.
    Verduijn M; Siegerink B; Jager KJ; Zoccali C; Dekker FW
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2010 May; 25(5):1394-8. PubMed ID: 20190244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Haycock PC; Burgess S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2016 May; 40(4):304-14. PubMed ID: 27061298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies.
    Burgess S; Thompson SG;
    Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 40(3):755-64. PubMed ID: 21414999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review.
    Bowden J; Holmes MV
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):486-496. PubMed ID: 30861319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods.
    Burgess S; Dudbridge F; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1880-906. PubMed ID: 26661904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Review on correction methods related to the pleiotropic effect in Mendelian randomization].
    Gao X; Wang H; Wang T
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 40(3):360-365. PubMed ID: 30884619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Beyond Mendelian randomization: how to interpret evidence of shared genetic predictors.
    Burgess S; Butterworth AS; Thompson JR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():208-16. PubMed ID: 26291580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clustered environments and randomized genes: a fundamental distinction between conventional and genetic epidemiology.
    Smith GD; Lawlor DA; Harbord R; Timpson N; Day I; Ebrahim S
    PLoS Med; 2007 Dec; 4(12):e352. PubMed ID: 18076282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mendelian randomization in multiple sclerosis: A causal role for vitamin D and obesity?
    Harroud A; Richards JB
    Mult Scler; 2018 Jan; 24(1):80-85. PubMed ID: 29307294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Usefulness of Mendelian randomization in observational epidemiology.
    Bochud M; Rousson V
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2010 Mar; 7(3):711-28. PubMed ID: 20616999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inferring the direction of a causal link and estimating its effect via a Bayesian Mendelian randomization approach.
    Bucur IG; Claassen T; Heskes T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1081-1111. PubMed ID: 31146640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome.
    Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 43(3):922-9. PubMed ID: 24608958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian randomization.
    van Kippersluis H; Rietveld CA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 28338774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Refractive Error Has Minimal Influence on the Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Mendelian Randomization Study.
    Wood A; Guggenheim JA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 206():87-93. PubMed ID: 30905725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.