223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33781925)
1. Young people's moral attitudes and motivations towards direct-to-consumer genetic testing for inherited risk of Alzheimer disease.
Pavarini G; Hamdi L; Lorimer J; Singh I
Eur J Med Genet; 2021 Jun; 64(6):104180. PubMed ID: 33781925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Savard J; Mooney-Somers J; Newson AJ; Kerridge I
Intern Med J; 2014 Jan; 44(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 24450520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "I would rather have it done by a doctor"-laypeople's perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications.
Schaper M; Wöhlke S; Schicktanz S
Med Health Care Philos; 2019 Mar; 22(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 29705970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Results to Accelerate Alzheimer Disease Clinical Trial Recruitment.
Ryan MM; Cox CG; Witbracht M; Hoang D; Gillen DL; Grill JD
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 2021 Apr-Jun 01; 35(2):141-147. PubMed ID: 33060367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of disease risk probability and disease type on interest in clinic-based versus direct-to-consumer genetic testing services.
Sherman K; Shaw LK; Champion K; Caldeira F; McCaskill M
J Behav Med; 2015 Oct; 38(5):706-14. PubMed ID: 25813985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.
Roberts JS; Gornick MC; Carere DA; Uhlmann WR; Ruffin MT; Green RC
Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 28068660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
Covolo L; Rubinelli S; Ceretti E; Gelatti U
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Dec; 17(12):e279. PubMed ID: 26677835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors Associated with Acceptability, Consideration and Intention of Uptake of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Survey Study.
Stewart KFJ; Kokole D; Wesselius A; Schols AMWJ; Zeegers MP; de Vries H; van Osch LADM
Public Health Genomics; 2018; 21(1-2):45-52. PubMed ID: 30359983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Third-Party Genetic Interpretation Tools: A Mixed-Methods Study of Consumer Motivation and Behavior.
Nelson SC; Bowen DJ; Fullerton SM
Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Jul; 105(1):122-131. PubMed ID: 31204012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.
Ruhl GL; Hazel JW; Clayton EW; Malin BA
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2019; 2019():774-783. PubMed ID: 32308873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Medicine, market and communication: ethical considerations in regard to persuasive communication in direct-to-consumer genetic testing services.
Schaper M; Schicktanz S
BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):56. PubMed ID: 29871685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic counseling following direct-to consumer genetic testing: Consumer perspectives.
Marzulla T; Roberts JS; DeVries R; Koeller DR; Green RC; Uhlmann WR
J Genet Couns; 2021 Feb; 30(1):329-334. PubMed ID: 32648332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the general public's view of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing and their interpretation of DTC website disclaimer messages.
Ruehl M; Hovick S; Philp A; Sweet K
Eur J Hum Genet; 2023 Aug; 31(8):939-944. PubMed ID: 37337090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Attitudes towards predictive genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease].
Illes F; Bernhardt T; Prell K; Rietz C; Rudinger G; Frölich L; Maier W; Rietschel M
Z Gerontol Geriatr; 2006 Jun; 39(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 16794889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Australians' perspectives on support around use of personal genomic testing: Findings from the Genioz study.
Metcalfe SA; Hickerton C; Savard J; Stackpoole E; Tytherleigh R; Tutty E; Terrill B; Turbitt E; Gray K; Middleton A; Wilson B; Newson AJ; Gaff C
Eur J Med Genet; 2019 May; 62(5):290-299. PubMed ID: 30439534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing with third party interpretation: beware of spurious results.
Horton R; Crawford G; Freeman L; Fenwick A; Lucassen A
Emerg Top Life Sci; 2019 Nov; 3(6):669-674. PubMed ID: 32915220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How to Approach Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing With Your Patients.
Renkes EM; Flanagan J; Deberg K; Bell M
S D Med; 2022 Nov; 75(11):518-520. PubMed ID: 36893031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health and kinship matter: Learning about direct-to-consumer genetic testing user experiences via online discussions.
Yin Z; Song L; Clayton EW; Malin BA
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238644. PubMed ID: 32898148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Direct-to-consumer genetic tests in the consulting room].
Gerrits EM; van Dooren MF; Bredenoord AL; van Mil MHW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2019 Nov; 163():. PubMed ID: 32073784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct to consumer genetic testing in Denmark-public knowledge, use, and attitudes.
Gerdes AM; Nicolaisen L; Husum E; Andersen JB; Gantzhorn MD; Roos L; Diness BR
Eur J Hum Genet; 2021 May; 29(5):851-860. PubMed ID: 33649540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
