BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33782926)

  • 1. Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile colon polyps: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Mehta D; Loutfy AH; Kushnir VM; Faulx AL; Smith ZL
    Endoscopy; 2022 Apr; 54(4):367-375. PubMed ID: 33782926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endoscopic mucosal resection using cold snare versus hot snare in treatment for 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: protocol of a non-inferiority randomised controlled study.
    Jiang Q; Yan X; Wang D; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Feng Y; Yang A; Wu D
    BMJ Open; 2023 May; 13(5):e070321. PubMed ID: 37217262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.
    Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting
    Zhang XQ; Sang JZ; Xu L; Mao XL; Li B; Zhu WL; Yang XY; Yu CH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 28(45):6397-6409. PubMed ID: 36533110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cold snare endoscopic resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and pooled-analysis.
    Thoguluva Chandrasekar V; Spadaccini M; Aziz M; Maselli R; Hassan S; Fuccio L; Duvvuri A; Frazzoni L; Desai M; Fugazza A; Jegadeesan R; Colombo M; Dasari CS; Hassan C; Sharma P; Repici A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 May; 89(5):929-936.e3. PubMed ID: 30639542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Rotermund C; Djinbachian R; Taghiakbari M; Enderle MD; Eickhoff A; von Renteln D
    World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Aug; 28(29):4007-4018. PubMed ID: 36157546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.
    Li D; Wang W; Xie J; Liu G; Wang R; Jiang C; Ye Z; Xu B; He X; Hong D
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):362-370. PubMed ID: 32150478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative efficacy and safety of resection techniques for treating 6 to 20mm, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Tziatzios G; Papaefthymiou A; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Marco S; Frazzoni L; Fuccio L; Paraskeva KD; Hassan C; Repici A; Sharma P; Rex DK; Triantafyllou K; Messmann H; Gkolfakis P
    Dig Liver Dis; 2023 Jul; 55(7):856-864. PubMed ID: 36336608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recurrences of advanced sessile and lateral spreading colorectal adenoma after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) thermal ablation versus no adjuvant therapy (RESPECT): a protocol of an international randomized controlled trial.
    Kemper G; Gerges C; Schoon EJ; Schreuder RM; Schrauwen RRW; Epping LSM; Beyna T; Drenth JPH; Gündug U; Siersema PD; van Geenen EJM;
    Trials; 2024 Feb; 25(1):132. PubMed ID: 38368409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal sessile polyps.
    Sato Y; Ozawa SI; Yasuda H; Kato M; Kiyokawa H; Yamashita M; Matsuo Y; Yamamoto H; Itoh F
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1820-1826. PubMed ID: 32356110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6-10 mm: a randomized trial.
    Papastergiou V; Paraskeva KD; Fragaki M; Dimas I; Vardas E; Theodoropoulou A; Mathou N; Giannakopoulos A; Karmiris K; Mpitouli A; Apessou D; Giannikaki L; Karagiannis JA; Chlouverakis G; Paspatis GA
    Endoscopy; 2018 Apr; 50(4):403-411. PubMed ID: 28898922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cold EMR vs. Hot EMR for the removal of sessile serrated polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ding C; Yang JF; Wang X; Zhou YF; Khizar H; Jin Z; Zhang XF
    BMC Surg; 2024 Mar; 24(1):93. PubMed ID: 38509508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection of Sessile Serrated Polyps 10 mm or Larger: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Thoguluva Chandrasekar V; Aziz M; Patel HK; Sidhu N; Duvvuri A; Dasari C; Kennedy KF; Ashwath A; Spadaccini M; Desai M; Jegadeesan R; Sathyamurthy A; Vennalaganti P; Kohli D; Hassan C; Pellise M; Repici A; Sharma P; Bourke MJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Oct; 18(11):2448-2455.e3. PubMed ID: 31786330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cold EMR of large sessile serrated polyps at colonoscopy (with video).
    Tutticci NJ; Hewett DG
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Mar; 87(3):837-842. PubMed ID: 29133196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Kim MJ; Na SY; Kim JS; Choi HH; Kim DB; Ji JS; Kim BW; Choi H
    Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):3789-3795. PubMed ID: 36690892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Higher rate of en bloc resection with underwater than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection: A meta-analysis.
    Tziatzios G; Gkolfakis P; Triantafyllou K; Fuccio L; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Probst A; Hassan C; Messmann H
    Dig Liver Dis; 2021 Aug; 53(8):958-964. PubMed ID: 34059445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness and safety of the different endoscopic resection methods for 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Yuan X; Gao H; Liu C; Cui H; Zhang Z; Xie J; Lu H; Xu L
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2021; 27(6):331-341. PubMed ID: 34643573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas (MATILDA-trial): rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
    Backes Y; Moons LM; van Bergeijk JD; Berk L; Ter Borg F; Ter Borg PC; Elias SG; Geesing JM; Groen JN; Hadithi M; Hardwick JC; Kerkhof M; Mangen MJ; Straathof JW; Schröder R; Schwartz MP; Spanier BW; de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH; Wolfhagen FH; Koch AD
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 16(1):56. PubMed ID: 27229709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.
    Oh CK; Cho YS; Lee SH; Lee BI
    Endoscopy; 2023 Feb; 55(2):158-164. PubMed ID: 35750321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy with submucosal injection for the removal of polyps less than 20 mm in size: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liang Z; Wei Y; Zhang S; Li P
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Nov; 38(11):1892-1899. PubMed ID: 37608577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.