These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33783089)

  • 1. Frankfort Mandibular Plane Angle: Critically Appraised Topic (CAT).
    Goldstein G; Goodacre C
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(S1):61-63. PubMed ID: 33783089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Significance of the Frankfort-mandibular plane angle to prosthodontics.
    DiPietro GJ; Moergeli JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Dec; 36(6):624-35. PubMed ID: 792431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Stability After Mandibular Setback With Minimal Orthodontics of Class III Patients With Different Facial Types.
    Lee YS; Kim YK; Yun PY; Larson BE; Lee NK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 74(7):1464.e1-1464.e10. PubMed ID: 27060493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
    Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of occlusion as related to the Frankfort-mandibular plane angle.
    DiPietro GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Oct; 38(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 269281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth.
    Tanaka EM; Sato S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):602.e1-11; discussion 602-3. PubMed ID: 18984389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the "myth" of posterior mandibular rotation.
    Haralabakis NB; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 15356494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A simplified technique for the clinical measurement of the Frankfort-mandibular plane angle].
    Karkazis HC; Chai JY
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1988; 32(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 3153695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cone-beam Computed Tomography-based three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of mandible symmetry and the occlusal plane of adult patients with high-angle skeletal class III malocclusion and jaw deformity.
    Teng C; Liu C; Yu Q; Liu S
    Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Jul; 127():105157. PubMed ID: 34015688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occlusal Vertical Dimension: Best Evidence Consensus Statement.
    Goldstein G; Goodacre C; MacGregor K
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(S1):12-19. PubMed ID: 33783090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An alternative for the correction of the Class II low mandibular plane angle.
    McCollum AG; Reyneke JP; Wolford LM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Mar; 67(3):231-41. PubMed ID: 2927916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Clinical Significance of Immediate Mandibular Lateral Translation: Critically Appraised Topic (CAT).
    Preiskel HW; Goldstein G
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(S1):64-66. PubMed ID: 33783092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between occlusal force and mandibular condyle morphology. Evaluated by limited cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kurusu A; Horiuchi M; Soma K
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1063-9. PubMed ID: 19852595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of anterior and posterior occlusal planes with different Angle and skeletal classes in permanent dentitions : A lateral cephalometric radiograph study.
    Čelar A; Tafaj E; Graf A; Lettner S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jul; 79(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 29777251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with a high mandibular plane angle corrected with 2-phase treatment.
    Kurosawa M; Ando K; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 19201332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Probability Index.
    Gramling JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Feb; 107(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 7847275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison between computer aided simulation and dental model orthognathic surgery for the treatment of patients with mandibular excess and facial asymmetries].
    Shen SY; Chen TT; Lu CP; Jiang TF; Wang XD; Shen GF
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):651-655. PubMed ID: 27806756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prognosis.
    TWEED CH
    Am J Orthod Oral Surg; 1946 Apr; 32():175-230. PubMed ID: 21022281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cephalometrically predicted occlusal plane: implications in removable prosthodontics.
    Karkazis HC; Polyzois GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):258-64. PubMed ID: 2051362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors associated with long-term vertical skeletal changes induced by facemask therapy in patients with Class III malocclusion.
    Kwak HJ; Park HJ; Kim YJ; Lee DY
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Mar; 88(2):157-162. PubMed ID: 29131663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.