These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33783277)

  • 1. Within-person variability can improve the identification of unfamiliar faces across changes in viewpoint.
    Hunnisett N; Favelle S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Nov; 74(11):1873-1887. PubMed ID: 33783277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. About Face: Matching Unfamiliar Faces Across Rotations of View and Lighting.
    Favelle S; Hill H; Claes P
    Iperception; 2017; 8(6):2041669517744221. PubMed ID: 29225768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identity-level representations affect unfamiliar face matching performance in sequential but not simultaneous tasks.
    Menon N; White D; Kemp RI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1777-93. PubMed ID: 25686094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Redesigning photo-ID to improve unfamiliar face matching performance.
    White D; Burton AM; Jenkins R; Kemp RI
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Jun; 20(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 24749864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unfamiliar Face Matching With Frontal and Profile Views.
    Kramer RSS; Reynolds MG
    Perception; 2018 Apr; 47(4):414-431. PubMed ID: 29402154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images.
    Bruce V; Henderson Z; Newman C; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Sep; 7(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 11676099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinct abilities associated with matching same identity faces versus discriminating different faces: Evidence from individual differences in prosopagnosics and controls.
    Berger A; Fry R; Bobak AK; Juliano A; DeGutis J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Dec; 75(12):2256-2271. PubMed ID: 35034524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Symmetrical Viewpoint Representations in Face-Selective Regions Convey an Advantage in the Perception and Recognition of Faces.
    Flack TR; Harris RJ; Young AW; Andrews TJ
    J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(19):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 30842248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early electrophysiological correlates of adaptation to personally familiar and unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes.
    Caharel S; Jacques C; d'Arripe O; Ramon M; Rossion B
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():85-98. PubMed ID: 21362409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognizing unfamiliar faces: the effects of distinctiveness and view.
    Newell FN; Chiroro P; Valentine T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):509-34. PubMed ID: 10428688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An image-invariant neural response to familiar faces in the human medial temporal lobe.
    Weibert K; Harris RJ; Mitchell A; Byrne H; Young AW; Andrews TJ
    Cortex; 2016 Nov; 84():34-42. PubMed ID: 27697662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Face learning and the emergence of view-independent face recognition: an event-related brain potential study.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1320-9. PubMed ID: 23583970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.
    Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finding an unfamiliar face in a line-up: Viewing multiple images of the target is beneficial on target-present trials but costly on target-absent trials.
    Matthews CM; Mondloch CJ
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 109(4):758-776. PubMed ID: 29658990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Socially Important Faces Are Processed Preferentially to Other Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces in a Priming Task across a Range of Viewpoints.
    Keyes H; Zalicks C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0156350. PubMed ID: 27219101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Ewbank MP; Smith WA; Hancock ER; Andrews TJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17507454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How robust is familiar face recognition? A repeat detection study of more than 1000 faces.
    Chapman AF; Hawkins-Elder H; Susilo T
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 May; 5(5):170634. PubMed ID: 29892342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying the effect of viewpoint changes on sensitivity to face identity.
    Swystun AG; Logan AJ
    Vision Res; 2019 Dec; 165():1-12. PubMed ID: 31610285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Getting to know you: from view-dependent to view-invariant repetition priming for unfamiliar faces.
    Martin D; Greer J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Feb; 64(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 21154112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is in a view? The role of featural information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces across viewpoint transformation.
    Stephan BC; Caine D
    Perception; 2007; 36(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 17402663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.