These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33783960)

  • 1. Variability in commercially available deformable image registration: A multi-institution analysis using virtual head and neck phantoms.
    Kubli A; Pukala J; Shah AP; Kelly P; Langen KM; Bova FJ; Mañon RR; Meeks SL
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):89-96. PubMed ID: 33783960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benchmarking of five commercial deformable image registration algorithms for head and neck patients.
    Pukala J; Johnson PB; Shah AP; Langen KM; Bova FJ; Staton RJ; Mañon RR; Kelly P; Meeks SL
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):25-40. PubMed ID: 27167256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a dynamic deformable thorax phantom for the quality management of deformable image registration.
    Sugawara Y; Kadoya N; Kotabe K; Nakajima Y; Ikeda R; Tanabe S; Ohashi H; Jingu K
    Phys Med; 2020 Sep; 77():100-107. PubMed ID: 32823209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A virtual phantom library for the quantification of deformable image registration uncertainties in patients with cancers of the head and neck.
    Pukala J; Meeks SL; Staton RJ; Bova FJ; Mañon RR; Langen KM
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111703. PubMed ID: 24320411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of commercially available deformable image registration platforms for contour propagation using patient-based computational phantoms: A multi-institutional study.
    Loi G; Fusella M; Lanzi E; Cagni E; Garibaldi C; Iacoviello G; Lucio F; Menghi E; Miceli R; Orlandini LC; Roggio A; Rosica F; Stasi M; Strigari L; Strolin S; Fiandra C
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):748-757. PubMed ID: 29266262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration.
    Kirby N; Chuang C; Ueda U; Pouliot J
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011702. PubMed ID: 23298072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The distance discordance metric-a novel approach to quantifying spatial uncertainties in intra- and inter-patient deformable image registration.
    Saleh ZH; Apte AP; Sharp GC; Shusharina NP; Wang Y; Veeraraghavan H; Thor M; Muren LP; Rao SS; Lee NY; Deasy JO
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 59(3):733-46. PubMed ID: 24440838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The level of detail required in a deformable phantom to accurately perform quality assurance of deformable image registration.
    Saenz DL; Kim H; Chen J; Stathakis S; Kirby N
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6269-80. PubMed ID: 27494827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evaluation of a hybrid biomechanical deformable registration method on a multistage physical phantom with reproducible deformation.
    Qin A; Ionascu D; Liang J; Han X; O'Connell N; Yan D
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):240. PubMed ID: 30514348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A neural network approach for fast, automated quantification of DIR performance.
    Neylon J; Min Y; Low DA; Santhanam A
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4126-4138. PubMed ID: 28477340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of deformable image registration techniques for alignment of longitudinal cholangiocarcinoma CT images.
    Sen A; Anderson BM; Cazoulat G; McCulloch MM; Elganainy D; McDonald BA; He Y; Mohamed ASR; Elgohari BA; Zaid M; Koay EJ; Brock KK
    Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1670-1679. PubMed ID: 31958147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of CT scan parameters on deformable image registration accuracy using deformable thorax phantom.
    Ikeda R; Kadoya N; Nakajima Y; Ishii S; Shibu T; Jingu K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 May; 24(5):e13917. PubMed ID: 36840512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy.
    Motegi K; Tachibana H; Motegi A; Hotta K; Baba H; Akimoto T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):229-236. PubMed ID: 30592137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A three-dimensional head-and-neck phantom for validation of multimodality deformable image registration for adaptive radiotherapy.
    Singhrao K; Kirby N; Pouliot J
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121709. PubMed ID: 25471956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geometric evaluation and quantifying dosimetric impact of diverse deformable image registration algorithms on abdomen images with biomechanically modeled deformations.
    Liu Y; Zhang P; Hong J; Alam S; Kuo L; Hu YC; Lu W; Cerviño L
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Dec; 25(12):e14511. PubMed ID: 39258711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations.
    Nie K; Chuang C; Kirby N; Braunstein S; Pouliot J
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041911. PubMed ID: 23556905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the accuracy of deformable image registration on MRI with a physical phantom.
    Wu RY; Liu AY; Yang J; Williamson TD; Wisdom PG; Bronk L; Gao S; Grosshan DR; Fuller DC; Gunn GB; Ronald Zhu X; Frank SJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):166-173. PubMed ID: 31808307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computed Tomography to Cone Beam Computed Tomography Deformable Image Registration for Contour Propagation Using Head and Neck, Patient-Based Computational Phantoms: A Multicenter Study.
    Loi G; Fusella M; Vecchi C; Menna S; Rosica F; Gino E; Maffei N; Menghi E; Savini A; Roggio A; Radici L; Cagni E; Lucio F; Strigari L; Strolin S; Garibaldi C; Romanò C; Piovesan M; Franco P; Fiandra C
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2020; 10(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 31786233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Uncertainties in dose warping due to the choice of deformable registration algorithm.
    Veiga C; Lourenço AM; Mouinuddin S; van Herk M; Modat M; Ourselin S; Royle G; McClelland JR
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):760-9. PubMed ID: 25652490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A quantitative evaluation of deformable image registration based on MV cone beam CT images: Impact of deformation magnitudes and image modalities.
    Huang Y; Li C; Wang H; Hu Q; Wang R; Chang C; Ma W; Li W; Wu H; Zhang Y
    Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():82-87. PubMed ID: 32097874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.