198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33786656)
21. LI-RADS version 2018 treatment response algorithm on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance and the added value of ancillary features.
Wang D; Zhang Y; Lyu R; Jia K; Xu PJ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38605217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Usefulness of Arterial Subtraction in Applying Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm to Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI.
Youn SY; Kim DH; Choi JI; Choi MH; Kim B; Shin YR; Oh SN; Rha SE
Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1289-1299. PubMed ID: 34047507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Performance of LI-RADS version 2018 CT treatment response algorithm in tumor response evaluation and survival prediction of patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation.
Zhang Y; Wang J; Li H; Zheng T; Jiang H; Li M; Song B
Ann Transl Med; 2020 Mar; 8(6):388. PubMed ID: 32355832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Overall Malignancy-A Systematic Review.
van der Pol CB; Lim CS; Sirlin CB; McGrath TA; Salameh JP; Bashir MR; Tang A; Singal AG; Costa AF; Fowler K; McInnes MDF
Gastroenterology; 2019 Mar; 156(4):976-986. PubMed ID: 30445016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: ESCULAP versus CEUS-LI-RADS.
Schellhaas B; Görtz RS; Pfeifer L; Kielisch C; Neurath MF; Strobel D
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Sep; 29(9):1036-1044. PubMed ID: 28562394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. LI-RADS LR-5 on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography has satisfactory diagnostic specificity for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jin H; Cai Y; Zhang M; Huang L; Bao W; Hu Q; Chen X; Zhou L; Ling W
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Feb; 13(2):957-969. PubMed ID: 36819240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A retrospective single-centre analysis of the oncological impact of LI-RADS classification applied to Metroticket 2.0 calculator in liver transplantation: every nodule matters.
Centonze L; Di Sandro S; Lauterio A; De Carlis R; Sgrazzutti C; Ciulli C; Vella I; Vicentin I; Incarbone N; Bagnardi V; Vanzulli A; De Carlis L
Transpl Int; 2021 Sep; 34(9):1712-1721. PubMed ID: 34448275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Kierans AS; Song C; Gavlin A; Roudenko A; Lu L; Askin G; Hecht EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1085-1092. PubMed ID: 32877248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Inter-observer agreement using the LI-RADS version 2018 CT treatment response algorithm in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with conventional transarterial chemoembolization.
Bartnik K; Podgórska J; Rosiak G; Korzeniowski K; Rowiński O
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Jan; 47(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 34581927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Compared with CT/MRI LI-RADS, whether CEUS LI-RADS is worth popularizing in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma?-a direct head-to-head meta-analysis.
Wang H; Cao J; Fan H; Huang J; Zhang H; Ling W
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Aug; 13(8):4919-4932. PubMed ID: 37581040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Added Value of CT Arterial Subtraction Images in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Treatment Response Categorization for Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization-Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Huh J; Kim B; Lee JH; Won JH; Kim J; Kwon Y; Kim JK
Invest Radiol; 2021 Feb; 56(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 33405431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy With Radiologic-Pathologic Explant Correlation in Patients With SBRT-Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Mendiratta-Lala M; Aslam A; Maturen KE; Westerhoff M; Maurino C; Parikh ND; Sun Y; Sonnenday CJ; Stein EB; Shampain KL; Kaza RK; Cuneo K; Masch W; Do RKG; Lawrence TS; Owen D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2022 Mar; 112(3):704-714. PubMed ID: 34644607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.
Shin J; Lee S; Bae H; Chung YE; Choi JY; Huh YM; Park MS
Liver Int; 2020 Oct; 40(10):2345-2352. PubMed ID: 32722894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. LI-RADS Treatment Response versus Modified RECIST for Diagnosing Viable Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Locoregional Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
Kim DH; Kim B; Choi JI; Oh SN; Rha SE
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi; 2022 Mar; 83(2):331-343. PubMed ID: 36237934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) for Differentiating Between Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Other Hepatic Malignancies in High-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis.
Li J; Yang L; Ma L; Lu Q; Luo Y
Ultraschall Med; 2021 Apr; 42(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 33307595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Increasing the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for diagnosis of small (10-19 mm) HCC on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI.
Chen J; Kuang S; Zhang Y; Tang W; Xie S; Zhang L; Rong D; He B; Deng Y; Xiao Y; Shi W; Fowler K; Wang J; Sirlin CB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1530-1542. PubMed ID: 33040166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic Performance of the 2018 EASL vs. LI-RADS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
Shin J; Lee S; Yoon JK; Roh YH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Dec; 58(6):1942-1950. PubMed ID: 37010244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Abbreviated MRI Protocol for the Assessment of Ablated Area in HCC Patients.
Granata V; Grassi R; Fusco R; Setola SV; Belli A; Piccirillo M; Pradella S; Giordano M; Cappabianca S; Brunese L; Grassi R; Petrillo A; Izzo F
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33808466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Compared with SonoVue
Cao J; Wang H; Ling W
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Apr; 14(4):2978-2992. PubMed ID: 38617150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnostic Performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2017 Versus Version 2018 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
Kim YY; Lee S; Shin J; Son WJ; Shin H; Lee JE; Hwang JA; Chung YE; Choi JY; Park MS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1912-1919. PubMed ID: 33929784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
