These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33786749)

  • 1. Unpredictive linguistic verbal cues accelerate congruent visual targets into awareness in a breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm.
    Paffen CLE; Sahakian A; Struiksma ME; Van der Stigchel S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2102-2112. PubMed ID: 33786749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness.
    Lupyan G; Ward EJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Aug; 110(35):14196-201. PubMed ID: 23940323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word recognition within a linguistic context: effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function.
    Benichov J; Cox LC; Tun PA; Wingfield A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 21918453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colour Terms Affect Detection of Colour and Colour-Associated Objects Suppressed from Visual Awareness.
    Forder L; Taylor O; Mankin H; Scott RB; Franklin A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152212. PubMed ID: 27023274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Remembering spatial words: Sensorimotor simulation affects verbal recognition memory.
    Kumcu A; Thompson RL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Sep; 75(9):1694-1710. PubMed ID: 34704887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic priming of attentional control by relevant colors.
    Ansorge U; Becker SI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):83-104. PubMed ID: 22016048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The saccadic Stroop effect: Evidence for involuntary programming of eye movements by linguistic cues.
    Hodgson TL; Parris BA; Gregory NJ; Jarvis T
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(5):569-74. PubMed ID: 19183561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Action evaluation is modulated dominantly by internal sensorimotor information and partly by noncausal external cue.
    Fukui T; Gomi H
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e34985. PubMed ID: 22563459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing words changes color perception: Facilitation of color discrimination by verbal and visual cues.
    Forder L; Lupyan G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jul; 148(7):1105-1123. PubMed ID: 30869955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evocative power of words: activation of concepts by verbal and nonverbal means.
    Lupyan G; Thompson-Schill SL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 Feb; 141(1):170-86. PubMed ID: 21928923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Communicating emotion: linking affective prosody and word meaning.
    Nygaard LC; Queen JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1017-30. PubMed ID: 18665742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensorimotor predictions shape reported conscious visual experience in a breaking continuous flash suppression task.
    Skora LI; Seth AK; Scott RB
    Neurosci Conscious; 2021; 2021(1):niab003. PubMed ID: 33763234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contribution of visual and linguistic cues to the production of passives in ADHD and DLD: evidence from thematic priming.
    Stanford E; Delage H
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2023 Jan; 37(1):17-51. PubMed ID: 34963407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foresight beats hindsight: The neural correlates underlying motor preparation in the pro-/anti-cue paradigm.
    Emmerling F; Duecker F; de Graaf TA; Schuhmann T; Adam JJ; Sack AT
    Brain Behav; 2017 May; 7(5):e00663. PubMed ID: 28523216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Redundant spoken labels facilitate perception of multiple items.
    Lupyan G; Spivey MJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2236-53. PubMed ID: 21097866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual and linguistic cues to graspable objects.
    Myachykov A; Ellis R; Cangelosi A; Fischer MH
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 229(4):545-59. PubMed ID: 23820977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The interplay of bottom-up and top-down mechanisms in visual guidance during object naming.
    Coco MI; Malcolm GL; Keller F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1096-120. PubMed ID: 24224949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment.
    Morrill T; Baese-Berk M; Heffner C; Dilley L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1451-7. PubMed ID: 25794478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.