These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33786773)

  • 21. Word frequency effects in immediate serial recall: item familiarity and item co-occurrence have the same effect.
    Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):325-32. PubMed ID: 15948617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An item/order trade-off explanation of word length and generation effects.
    Hendry L; Tehan G
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):364-71. PubMed ID: 15948622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The item-order hypothesis reconsidered: the role of order information in free recall.
    Engelkamp J; Jahn P; Seiler KH
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 14634815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A multiple case study of verbal short-term memory in velo-cardio-facial syndrome.
    Majerus S; Glaser B; Van der Linden M; Eliez S
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2006 Jun; 50(Pt 6):457-69. PubMed ID: 16672039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Order information and free recall: evaluating the item-order hypothesis.
    Mulligan NW; Lozito JP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 May; 60(5):732-51. PubMed ID: 17455079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Beginning at the beginning: Recall order and the number of words to be recalled.
    Tan L; Ward G; Paulauskaite L; Markou M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1282-92. PubMed ID: 26844583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of selective attention and a stimulus prefix on the output order of immediate free recall of short and long lists.
    Grenfell-Essam R; Ward G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Mar; 69(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 25730637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Phonological similarity in the serial recall task hinders item recall, not just order.
    Roodenrys S; Guitard D; Miller LM; Saint-Aubin J; Barron JM
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Nov; 113(4):1100-1120. PubMed ID: 35692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The distinctiveness of the word-length effect.
    Hulme C; Neath I; Stuart G; Shostak L; Surprenant AM; Brown GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):586-94. PubMed ID: 16719668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Disentangling the effects of word frequency and contextual diversity on serial recall performance.
    Parmentier FBR; Comesaña M; Soares AP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jan; 70(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 26513378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lexicality and phonological similarity: a challenge for the retrieval-based account of serial recall?
    Fallon AB; Mak E; Tehan G; Daly C
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):349-56. PubMed ID: 15948620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Common modality effects in immediate free recall and immediate serial recall.
    Grenfell-Essam R; Ward G; Tan L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1909-1933. PubMed ID: 28557502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Working memory and serial order: Evidence against numerical order codes but for item-position associations.
    Majerus S; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Dec; 46(12):2244-2260. PubMed ID: 31750722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can the effects of temporal grouping explain the similarities and differences between free recall and serial recall?
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ; Farrell S
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):469-88. PubMed ID: 25331276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Word frequency and memory: effects on absolute versus relative order memory and on item memory versus order memory.
    Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Oct; 29(7):977-85. PubMed ID: 11820757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Re-assessing age of acquisition effects in recognition, free recall, and serial recall.
    Macmillan MB; Neath I; Surprenant AM
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):939-954. PubMed ID: 33558995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Orthographic distinctiveness and memory for order.
    Glanc G; Greene R
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):865-71. PubMed ID: 22900996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reexamining the phonological similarity effect in immediate serial recall: the roles of type of similarity, category cuing, and item recall.
    Gupta P; Lipinski J; Aktunc E
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1001-16. PubMed ID: 16496721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Additional evidence that valence does not affect serial recall.
    Guitard D; Neath I; Saint-Aubin J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Aug; 76(8):1790-1796. PubMed ID: 36073985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Semantic Relatedness Effects in Serial Recall But Not in Serial Reconstruction of Order.
    Ian Neath ; Saint-Aubin J; Surprenant AM
    Exp Psychol; 2022 Jul; 69(4):196-209. PubMed ID: 36305453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.