These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33787417)

  • 1. Long-Term Outcome Comparison Between Two Specimen Extraction Approaches for Middle Rectum Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
    Zhong Y; Qiao T; Ma T; Hu H; Jin Y; Wang Y; Tang Q; Huang R; Wang G; Wang X
    Surg Innov; 2021 Dec; 28(6):738-746. PubMed ID: 33787417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of the mid- and long-term outcomes between natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery with abdominal auxiliary incision in the treatment of rectal cancer based on propensity score matching method].
    Xu S; Zhang H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 24(8):698-703. PubMed ID: 34412187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matching study.
    Zhang H; Hu H; Huang R; Guan Z; Zheng M; Xu C; Li Z; Wang Y; Zhang W; Yu L; Jin Y; Tang Q; Wang G; Wang X
    Updates Surg; 2022 Apr; 74(2):599-607. PubMed ID: 34370279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus robotic transabdominal specimen extraction surgery for early-stage rectal cancer: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis (in China).
    Liu D; He G; Yao H; Guan X; Wang G; Xiong D; Hu J; Yuan W; Yang C; He P; Ye S; Ju H; Yu H; Niu Z; Liu K; Tang Q; Huang R; Lian Y; Guan S; Jian J; Wei Y; Wang X; Li T
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Aug; 38(8):4521-4530. PubMed ID: 38914889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term oncologic outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment of rectal cancer: a propensity-score matching study.
    Li Z; Xiong H; Qiao T; Jiao S; Zhu Y; Wang G; Wang X; Tang Q
    BMC Surg; 2022 Jul; 22(1):286. PubMed ID: 35879754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term efficacy of transvaginal specimen extraction for right colon cancer based on propensity score matching: A retrospective cohort study.
    Li XW; Wang CY; Zhang JJ; Ge Z; Lin XH; Hu JH
    Int J Surg; 2019 Dec; 72():102-108. PubMed ID: 31362128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled study with 3-year follow-up results].
    Chen ZZ; Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yuan SS; Yan F; Wang ZF; Liu GY; Qiu XF; Cai JC
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jul; 25(7):604-611. PubMed ID: 35844123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advancing mid-rectal cancer surgery: Unveiling the potential of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in comparison to conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection.
    Muhammad S; Jiang Z; Fan T; Tang Q; Hai Y; Ehsan SBE; Bilal M; Zubayraeva AA; Gao Y; He J
    Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2024 May; 7(5):e2003. PubMed ID: 38703000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Anterior Resections for Cancer with Natural Orifice Versus Conventional Specimen Extraction: A Case-Control Study.
    Chang SC; Chen HC; Chen YC; Ke TW; Tsai YY; Wang HM; Fingerhut A; Chen WT
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Aug; 63(8):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 32692072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.
    Feng Q; Ng SSM; Zhang Z; Lin S; Niu Z; Wei Y; He G; Chang W; Zhu D; Xu J
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 124(4):607-618. PubMed ID: 34076898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of short-term efficacy analysis of medium-rectal cancer surgery with robotic natural orifice specimen extraction and robotic transabdominal specimen extraction.
    Ye SP; Lu WJ; Liu DN; Yu HX; Wu C; Xu HC; Li TY
    BMC Surg; 2023 Nov; 23(1):336. PubMed ID: 37940918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative long-term outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Xu SZ; Wang ZF; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yuan SB; Yan F; Liu GY; Cai JC
    Int J Surg; 2024 Mar; 110(3):1402-1410. PubMed ID: 38484259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in short-terms outcomes of middle rectal cancer.
    Ye SP; Yu HX; Liu DN; Lu WJ; Wu C; Xu HC; Li TY
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):196. PubMed ID: 37403084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study.
    Tang Q; Zhu Y; Xiong H; Sheng X; Hu Z; Hu H; Huang R; Zhang Q; Yuan Z; Xie L; Gao Z; Wang Y; Wang G; Wang X
    Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():2247-2257. PubMed ID: 33727861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term and long-term outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgeries (NOSES) in rectal cancer: a comparison study of NOSES and non-NOSES.
    Zhang Q; Wang M; Ma D; Zhang W; Wu H; Zhong Y; Zheng C; Ju H; Wang G
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Apr; 10(8):488. PubMed ID: 35571383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment effects of low rectal cancer.
    Zhu Y; Xiong H; Chen Y; Liu Z; Jiang Z; Huang R; Gao F; Zhang Q; Wang M; Jin Y; Qiao T; Ma T; Hu H; Wang X; Tang Q; Wang G
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):9338. PubMed ID: 33927293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional robotic resection for patients with colorectal neoplasms.
    Li L; Liu K; Li T; Zhou J; Xu S; Yu N; Guo Z; Yao H
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1153751. PubMed ID: 37007091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of transabdominal wall specimen retrieval and natural orifice specimen extraction robotic surgery in the outcome of colorectal cancer treatment.
    Houqiong J; Ziwen W; Chonghan Z; Penghui H; Hongxin Y; Weijie L; Dongning L; Taiyuan L
    Front Surg; 2023; 10():1092128. PubMed ID: 36874472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative short- and long-term outcomes of three techniques of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for rectal cancer.
    Guan X; Lu Z; Wang S; Liu E; Zhao Z; Chen H; Zhang M; Hu X; Muhammad S; Ma C; Ma X; Huang H; Jiang Z; Liu Z; Wang G; Wang X
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt B):e55-e61. PubMed ID: 32782201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Multicenter Study Evaluating Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for Rectal Cancer.
    Liu Z; Efetov S; Guan X; Zhou H; Tulina I; Wang G; Tsarkov P; Wang X;
    J Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 243():236-241. PubMed ID: 31229790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.