These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. A tale of four cases: Patrick, Bolt, Mitchell, and Oltz. Chenen AR Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 10292421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review splits Calif. medical community. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1988 Oct; 18(44):98. PubMed ID: 10290221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review/hospital privileges/credentialing. Springer EW Leg Med; 1994; ():57-81. PubMed ID: 7830486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Strategies for eliminating unfairness in peer review. Rozovsky FA; Rozovsky LE Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10115449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply? Meghrigian AG Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liability for peer review and privilege suspension. Davis CD Tex Hosp; 1984 Jul; 40(2):42. PubMed ID: 10267575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. California court clarifies medical staff hearing procedures. Christensen JD Health Law Vigil; 1988 Apr; 11(9):7-8. PubMed ID: 10286816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The physician and hospital privileges. Hirsch HL Leg Med Q; 1981-1983; 5-7():179-91. PubMed ID: 10287959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Staff privileges--$2 million antitrust judgment reversed. Carlson DR Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(21):1-4. PubMed ID: 10284024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review in the wake of Patrick. McCormick B Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):17. PubMed ID: 10288090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]