These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3378774)

  • 1. Is there a proctor in the house?
    Koska MT
    Hospitals; 1988 Jun; 62(12):65. PubMed ID: 3378774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antitrust and hospital peer review.
    Blumstein JF; Sloan FA
    Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):7-92. PubMed ID: 10295966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antitrust immunity in Colorado peer review actions.
    Earnest GL
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Dec; 7(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 10296371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review: Patrick redux.
    Cohen HH
    Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 10104770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertainty and unpredictability in application of peer review privileges statutes.
    Hicks JT
    J Health Hosp Law; 1991 May; 24(5):137-43, 167. PubMed ID: 10110682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical staff peer review and federal antitrust scrutiny.
    LaCava FW
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1985 Aug; 70(8):40-1. PubMed ID: 10272117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review, privileges: MDs fear legal tangles.
    Koska MT
    Trustee; 1990 Feb; 43(2):19. PubMed ID: 10104264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A tale of four cases: Patrick, Bolt, Mitchell, and Oltz.
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 10292421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review splits Calif. medical community.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1988 Oct; 18(44):98. PubMed ID: 10290221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review/hospital privileges/credentialing.
    Springer EW
    Leg Med; 1994; ():57-81. PubMed ID: 7830486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategies for eliminating unfairness in peer review.
    Rozovsky FA; Rozovsky LE
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10115449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply?
    Meghrigian AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Liability for peer review and privilege suspension.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1984 Jul; 40(2):42. PubMed ID: 10267575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. California court clarifies medical staff hearing procedures.
    Christensen JD
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Apr; 11(9):7-8. PubMed ID: 10286816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The physician and hospital privileges.
    Hirsch HL
    Leg Med Q; 1981-1983; 5-7():179-91. PubMed ID: 10287959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Staff privileges--$2 million antitrust judgment reversed.
    Carlson DR
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(21):1-4. PubMed ID: 10284024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review in the wake of Patrick.
    McCormick B
    Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):17. PubMed ID: 10288090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical peer review under legal knife.
    Kosterlitz J
    Natl J (Wash); 1988 Mar; 20(13):820. PubMed ID: 10286588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antitrust law and the medical staff.
    Holthaus D
    Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):23. PubMed ID: 10288093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer group committee tackles physician behavior problems.
    Skillicorn SA
    Hosp Med Staff; 1981 Jul; 10(7):2-6. PubMed ID: 10252366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.