These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33787972)
1. Assessment of myocardial deformation with CMR: a comparison with ultrasound speckle tracking. Domenech-Ximenos B; Sanz-de la Garza M; Sepulveda-Martinez Á; Lorenzatti D; Simard F; Crispi F; Perea RJ; Prat-Gonzalez S; Sitges M Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7242-7250. PubMed ID: 33787972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A head-to-head comparison of speckle tracking echocardiography and feature tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in right ventricular deformation. Taha K; Bourfiss M; Te Riele ASJM; Cramer MM; van der Heijden JF; Asselbergs FW; Velthuis BK; Teske AJ Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jul; 22(8):950-958. PubMed ID: 32462176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of biventricular myocardial function using cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking, endocardial border delineation and echocardiographic speckle tracking in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and healthy controls. Kempny A; Fernández-Jiménez R; Orwat S; Schuler P; Bunck AC; Maintz D; Baumgartner H; Diller GP J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 May; 14(1):32. PubMed ID: 22650308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Layer-Specific Strain Is Preload Dependent: Comparison between Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature-Tracking. Grund FF; Kristensen CB; Myhr KA; Vejlstrup N; Hassager C; Mogelvang R J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2021 Apr; 34(4):377-387. PubMed ID: 33421611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Left ventricular mechanics assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of high-resolution speckle tracking and feature tracking. Aurich M; Keller M; Greiner S; Steen H; Aus dem Siepen F; Riffel J; Katus HA; Buss SJ; Mereles D Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1370-1378. PubMed ID: 27013249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Test-retest reliability of left and right ventricular systolic function by new and conventional echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance parameters. Houard L; Militaru S; Tanaka K; Pasquet A; Vancraeynest D; Vanoverschelde JL; Pouleur AC; Gerber BL Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Sep; 22(10):1157-1167. PubMed ID: 32793957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance based evaluation of myocardial strain and relationship with late gadolinium enhancement. Erley J; Genovese D; Tapaskar N; Alvi N; Rashedi N; Besser SA; Kawaji K; Goyal N; Kelle S; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V; Patel AR J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Aug; 21(1):46. PubMed ID: 31391036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct comparison of multilayer left ventricular global longitudinal strain using CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography. Ananthapadmanabhan S; Vo G; Nguyen T; Dimitri H; Otton J BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Feb; 21(1):107. PubMed ID: 33607946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Myocardial deformation in patients with a single left ventricle using 2D cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking: a case-control study. Strodka F; Logoteta J; Schuwerk R; Salehi Ravesh M; Gabbert DD; Uebing AS; Krupickova S; Voges I Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Aug; 37(8):2549-2559. PubMed ID: 33788063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Myocardial deformation imaging by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography for prediction of global and segmental functional changes after acute myocardial infarction: a comparison with late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance. Altiok E; Tiemann S; Becker M; Koos R; Zwicker C; Schroeder J; Kraemer N; Schoth F; Adam D; Friedman Z; Marx N; Hoffmann R J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Mar; 27(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 24368027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved segmental myocardial strain reproducibility using deformable registration algorithms compared with feature tracking cardiac MRI and speckle tracking echocardiography. Wang J; Li W; Sun J; Liu H; Kang Y; Yang D; Yu L; Greiser A; Zhou X; Han Y; Chen Y J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):404-414. PubMed ID: 29283466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of global myocardial function by cine MRI deformable registration-based analysis: Comparison with MR feature tracking and speckle-tracking echocardiography. Lamacie MM; Thavendiranathan P; Hanneman K; Greiser A; Jolly MP; Ward R; Wintersperger BJ Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1404-1415. PubMed ID: 27491873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Myocardial strain assessed by feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with a variety of cardiovascular diseases - A comparison with echocardiography. Pryds K; Larsen AH; Hansen MS; Grøndal AYK; Tougaard RS; Hansson NH; Clemmensen TS; Løgstrup BB; Wiggers H; Kim WY; Bøtker HE; Nielsen RR Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11296. PubMed ID: 31383914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of Automated Three-Dimensional Rotational Mechanics by Real-Time Volume Transthoracic Echocardiography: Preliminary Accuracy and Reproducibility Data Compared with Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Zhou X; Thavendiranathan P; Chen Y; Cheng L; Qian Z; Liu S; Houle H; Zhi G; Vannan MA J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2016 Jan; 29(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 26363710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehensive Assessment of Right Ventricular Function by Three-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography: Comparisons with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Li Y; Zhang L; Gao Y; Wan X; Xiao Q; Zhang Y; Sun W; Xie Y; Zeng Q; Chen Y; Jin Q; Wu W; Yang Y; Wang J; Lv Q; Shi H; Xie M J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2021 May; 34(5):472-482. PubMed ID: 33383121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography. van Everdingen WM; Zweerink A; Nijveldt R; Salden OAE; Meine M; Maass AH; Vernooy K; De Lange FJ; van Rossum AC; Croisille P; Clarysse P; Geelhoed B; Rienstra M; Van Gelder IC; Vos MA; Allaart CP; Cramer MJ Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Mar; 34(3):443-456. PubMed ID: 29043465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of right ventricular remodeling in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension by 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography: A comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance. Wang Y; Guo D; Liu M; Zhang X; Hu H; Yang H; Yang Y; Lv X; Li Y; Guo X Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():999389. PubMed ID: 36465465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of Biventricular Myocardial Strain Using CMR Feature Tracking: Reproducibility in Small Animals. Li H; Qu Y; Metze P; Sommerfeld F; Just S; Abaei A; Rasche V Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():8492705. PubMed ID: 33553431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Myocardial strain analysis of the right ventricle: comparison of different cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiographic techniques. Erley J; Tanacli R; Genovese D; Tapaskar N; Rashedi N; Bucius P; Kawaji K; Karagodin I; Lang RM; Kelle S; Mor-Avi V; Patel AR J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Jul; 22(1):51. PubMed ID: 32698811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defining the optimal temporal and spatial resolution for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking. Backhaus SJ; Metschies G; Billing M; Schmidt-Rimpler J; Kowallick JT; Gertz RJ; Lapinskas T; Pieske-Kraigher E; Pieske B; Lotz J; Bigalke B; Kutty S; Hasenfuß G; Kelle S; Schuster A J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 May; 23(1):60. PubMed ID: 34001175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]