These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33788844)

  • 41. On the immediate consequences of intergroup categorization: activation of approach and avoidance motor behavior toward ingroup and outgroup members.
    Paladino MP; Castelli L
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):755-68. PubMed ID: 18388255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The biological roots of political extremism.
    Keene JR; Shoenberger H; Berke CK; Bolls PD
    Politics Life Sci; 2017; 36(2):37-48. PubMed ID: 29355102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Us versus them: Political attitudes and party affiliation influence neural response to faces of presidential candidates.
    Kaplan JT; Freedman J; Iacoboni M
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16764897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Isms dimensions: toward a more comprehensive and integrative model of belief-system components.
    Saucier G
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 May; 104(5):921-39. PubMed ID: 23607535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations.
    Mannix E; Neale MA
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2005 Oct; 6(2):31-55. PubMed ID: 26158478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An attributional analysis of reactions to poverty: the political ideology of the giver and the perceived morality of the receiver.
    Weiner B; Osborne D; Rudolph U
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2011 May; 15(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 21041535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Words hurt: Political rhetoric, emotions/affect, and psychological well-being among Mexican-origin youth.
    Chavez LR; Campos B; Corona K; Sanchez D; Ruiz CB
    Soc Sci Med; 2019 May; 228():240-251. PubMed ID: 30928882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Are political-opinion pollsters missing ambivalence: "I love Trump"… "I hate Trump".
    Camparo JC; Camparo LB
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247580. PubMed ID: 33705443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Motivated independence? Implicit party identity predicts political judgments among self-proclaimed Independents.
    Hawkins CB; Nosek BA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1437-52. PubMed ID: 22875789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Understanding cultural omnivores: social and political attitudes.
    Chan TW
    Br J Sociol; 2019 Jun; 70(3):784-806. PubMed ID: 31190383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Deconstructing bias in social preferences reveals groupy and not-groupy behavior.
    Kranton R; Pease M; Sanders S; Huettel S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(35):21185-21193. PubMed ID: 32817487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election.
    Vitak J; Zube P; Smock A; Carr CT; Ellison N; Lampe C
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2011 Mar; 14(3):107-14. PubMed ID: 20649449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Rethinking the link between categorization and prejudice within the social cognition perspective.
    Park B; Judd CM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2005; 9(2):108-30. PubMed ID: 15869378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology.
    Hibbing JR; Smith KB; Alford JR
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Jun; 37(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 24970428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. When the Spatial and Ideological Collide: Metaphorical Conflict Shapes Social Perception.
    Kleiman T; Stern C; Trope Y
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Mar; 27(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 26833756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Mixed partisan households and electoral participation in the United States.
    Hersh E; Ghitza Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0203997. PubMed ID: 30303974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Conservative and liberal attitudes drive polarized neural responses to political content.
    Leong YC; Chen J; Willer R; Zaki J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov; 117(44):27731-27739. PubMed ID: 33082227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The impact of personality on cognitive, behavioral, and affective political processes: the effects of need to evaluate.
    Bizer GY; Krosnick JA; Holbrook AL; Wheeler SC; Rucker DD; Petty RE
    J Pers; 2004 Oct; 72(5):995-1027. PubMed ID: 15335335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The importance of adult life-span perspective in explaining variations in political ideology.
    Sedek G; Kossowska M; Rydzewska K
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Jun; 37(3):329-30. PubMed ID: 24970451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Why People Hate Congress but Love Their Own Congressperson: An Information Processing Explanation.
    Lammers J; Pauels E; Fleischmann A; Galinsky AD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 Mar; 48(3):412-425. PubMed ID: 33870799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.