289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33789485)
1. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision knee arthroplasty.
Sabah SA; Alvand A; Beard DJ; Price AJ
Bone Joint J; 2021 Apr; 103-B(4):627-634. PubMed ID: 33789485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS-10 Global Health and EQ-5D questionnaires in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.
Shim J; Hamilton DF
Bone Joint J; 2019 Jul; 101-B(7):832-837. PubMed ID: 31256677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the Chinese (Mandarin) Version of the Oxford Knee Score in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.
Lin K; Bao L; Wang J; Fujita K; Makimoto K; Liao X
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):2992-3004. PubMed ID: 28884273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The preoperative Oxford Knee Score is an independent predictor of achieving a postoperative ceiling score after total knee arthroplasty.
Clement ND; Afzal I; Demetriou C; Deehan DJ; Field RE; Kader DF
Bone Joint J; 2020 Nov; 102-B(11):1519-1526. PubMed ID: 33135448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Poor Knee-specific and Generic Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores at 6 Months Are Associated With Early Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Ackerman IN; Harris IA; Cashman K; Rowden N; Lorimer M; Graves SE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 35901436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5d poorly predict patient's satisfaction following mechanically aligned total knee replacement: A cross-sectional study.
Gummaraju A; Maillot C; Baryeh K; Villet L; Rivière C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 May; 107(3):102867. PubMed ID: 33639287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS stand-alone component and Oxford knee score in the Australian knee arthroplasty population utilising minimally important difference, concurrent validity, predictive validity and responsiveness.
Lin DY; Cheok TS; Kaambwa B; Samson AJ; Morrison C; Chan T; Kroon HM; Jaarsma RL
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 May; 21(1):41. PubMed ID: 37165364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Associations between preoperative Oxford hip and knee scores and costs and quality of life of patients undergoing primary total joint replacement in the NHS England: an observational study.
Eibich P; Dakin HA; Price AJ; Beard D; Arden NK; Gray AM
BMJ Open; 2018 Apr; 8(4):e019477. PubMed ID: 29643154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating change using patient-reported outcome measures in knee replacement: the complementary nature of the EQ-5D index and VAS scores.
Lin FJ; Samp J; Munoz A; Wong PS; Pickard AS
Eur J Health Econ; 2014 Jun; 15(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 23765331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L, the Oxford Hip Score, and the Oxford Knee Score in the NHS patient-reported outcome measures.
Kang S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Jan; 16(1):18. PubMed ID: 33413483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient-Reported Function and Quality of Life After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 10,727 Patients from the NHS PROMs Program.
Sabah SA; Alvand A; Knight R; Beard DJ; Price AJ
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Aug; 36(8):2887-2895.e7. PubMed ID: 33840536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 'Worse than death' and waiting for a joint arthroplasty.
Scott CEH; MacDonald DJ; Howie CR
Bone Joint J; 2019 Aug; 101-B(8):941-950. PubMed ID: 31362549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the Spanish version of the Oxford knee score and assessment of its utility to characterize quality of life of patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis: a multicentric study.
Martín-Fernández J; García-Maroto R; Sánchez-Jiménez FJ; Bau-González A; Valencia-García H; Gutiérrez-Teira B; Arenaza JC; García-Pérez L; Linertová R; Bilbao A
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Sep; 15(1):186. PubMed ID: 28962613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patients in high- and low-revision hospitals have similar outcomes after primary knee arthroplasty: 1-year postoperative results from the Danish prospective multicenter cohort study, SPARK.
Mørup-Petersen A; Krogsgaard MR; Laursen M; Madsen F; Winther-Jensen M; Odgaard A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Aug; 31(8):3487-3499. PubMed ID: 37042976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine tool to select candidates for hip and knee replacement surgery: development and economic modelling.
Price A; Smith J; Dakin H; Kang S; Eibich P; Cook J; Gray A; Harris K; Middleton R; Gibbons E; Benedetto E; Smith S; Dawson J; Fitzpatrick R; Sayers A; Miller L; Marques E; Gooberman-Hill R; Blom A; Judge A; Arden N; Murray D; Glyn-Jones S; Barker K; Carr A; Beard D
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(32):1-216. PubMed ID: 31287051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-cultural translation and validation of the Chinese Oxford Knee Score and the Activity and Participation Questionnaire.
Chen C; Wang W; Wu H; Gao A; Qiu Y; Weng W; Price A
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2020; 28(2):2309499020910668. PubMed ID: 32301381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and construct validity of the Dutch Oxford Knee Score - Activity and Participation Questionnaire.
Te Molder MEM; Vriezekolk JE; Bénard MR; Heesterbeek PJC
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Aug; 22(1):700. PubMed ID: 34404359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. There is no clinically important difference in the Oxford knee scores between one and two years after total knee arthroplasty: The one-year score could be used as the benchmark timepoint to assess outcome.
Clement ND; Afzal I; Demetriou C; Deehan DJ; Field RE; Kader D
Knee; 2020 Aug; 27(4):1212-1218. PubMed ID: 32711884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative Factors Affecting the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Total Knee Replacement: Socioeconomic Factors and Preoperative OKS Have a Clinically Meaningful Effect.
Demetriou C; Webb J; Sedgwick P; Afzal I; Field R; Kader D
J Knee Surg; 2022 Jul; 35(9):940-948. PubMed ID: 33450777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ten-year patient-reported outcomes following total and minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis.
Burn E; Sanchez-Santos MT; Pandit HG; Hamilton TW; Liddle AD; Murray DW; Pinedo-Villanueva R
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1455-1464. PubMed ID: 28032123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
