175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3378957)
21. In vitro activity of ampicillin plus sulbactam against anaerobes compared to ampicillin and cefoxitin.
Heizmann W; Heilmann F; Werner H
Infection; 1987; 15(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 3692611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of susceptibility results of the Bacteroides fragilis group and other anaerobes by traditional MIC results and statistical methods.
Aldridge KE; Johnson WD
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1997 Mar; 39(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 9096180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In-vitro antibiotic susceptibility and molecular analysis of anaerobic bacteria isolated in Cape Town, South Africa.
Koch CL; Derby P; Abratt VR
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1998 Aug; 42(2):245-8. PubMed ID: 9738844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Susceptibility trends of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates from Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fernández Canigia L; Castello L; Di Martino A; Greco G; Legaria MC; Litterio M; Predari SC; Rollet R; Rossetti A; Carloni G; Sarchi MI; Bianchini H
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2007; 39(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 17987852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to meropenem.
Nord CE; Lindmark A; Persson I
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1989 Sep; 24 Suppl A():113-7. PubMed ID: 2553656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Antibacterial activity of cefminox against anaerobes.
Watanabe K; Sawa K; Bunai M; Ueno K
J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1985 May; 38(5):649-60. PubMed ID: 3874857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro activity of pipecolic acid amide of clindamycin (U-57930E) on anaerobic bacteria compared with those of clindamycin, cefoxitin, and chloramphenicol.
Dhawan VK; Bansal MB; Thadepalli H
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Aug; 22(2):350-1. PubMed ID: 6927289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to PD 131628.
Nord CE; Hagelbäck A
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Jan; 11(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 1314176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Susceptibility to five antimicrobial agents of strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolated in Brazil.
De Almeida AE; De Uzeda M
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1987 Apr; 31(4):617-8. PubMed ID: 3649203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Antimicrobial activity of ornidazole and 6 other antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria].
Alados JC; Martínez-Brocal A; Miranda C; Rojo MD; García V; Domínguez MC; de la Rosa M
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1991 Apr; 9(4):219-22. PubMed ID: 1863621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Activity of seven antimicrobial agents against "Bacteroides fragilis" (author's transl)].
Tytgat F
Ann Microbiol (Paris); 1980; 131(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 6899739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro activity of flomoxef compared to moxalactam, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, and clindamycin against anaerobes.
Werner H; Heizmann W; Luft G
Arzneimittelforschung; 1988 Nov; 38(11):1553-6. PubMed ID: 3214438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Anaerobic cocci and their resistance patterns to penicillin, cefoxitin, clindamycin and metronidazole: a Bulgarian study.
Boyanova L; Osmanliev D; Petrov D; Mitov I; Usunova I; Petrov S; Minchev TZ
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2000 Nov; 6(11):623-4. PubMed ID: 11168069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Sensitivity of anaerobes to 8 antibiotics].
Sedallian A
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1986 Jun; 34(5 Pt 2):645-7. PubMed ID: 3534760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patterns of resistance to anaerobic organisms in Australia.
Munro R
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989; 12(4 Suppl):159S-163S. PubMed ID: 2591175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The comparative in-vitro activity of cefotetan against anaerobic bacteria.
Watt B; Brown FV
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1985 Jun; 15(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 3861604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [In vitro effect of piperacillin, amoxicillin, cefoxitin and metronidazole against obligate anaerobic bacteria].
Derriennic M; Reynaud A; Launay C; Courtieu AL
Presse Med; 1986 Dec; 15(46):2279-81. PubMed ID: 2949268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative anti-anaerobic activity of Men 10700, a penem antibiotic.
Hamilton-Miller JM; Shah S
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 1998 Nov; 10(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 9916909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. E-test: a new technique for antimicrobial susceptibility testing for periodontal microorganisms.
Nachnani S; Scuteri A; Newman MG; Avanessian AB; Lomeli SL
J Periodontol; 1992 Jul; 63(7):576-83. PubMed ID: 1324301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro activity of cefoperazone plus sulbactam compared with that of other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria.
Wexler HM; Finegold SM
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1988 Mar; 32(3):403-6. PubMed ID: 3364960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
