These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3379023)

  • 41. Child sexual abuse: why the controversy?
    Terr LC
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1989 Sep; 28(5):788. PubMed ID: 2793806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Expert judgment in cases of alleged child sexual abuse: clinicians' sensitivity to suggestive influences, pre-existing beliefs and base rate estimates.
    Finnilä-Tuohimaa K; Santtila P; Sainio M; Niemi P; Sandnabba K
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Apr; 50(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 18826426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Do jurors "know" what isn't so about child witnesses?
    Quas JA; Thompson WC; Alison K; Stewart C
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):425-56. PubMed ID: 16133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Psychiatric investigation of allegations of child sexual abuse.
    Mareth TR; Raisani KK
    Mil Med; 1994 Jul; 159(7):487-90. PubMed ID: 7816219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Memory, repression, and child sexual abuse: forensic implications for the mental health professional.
    Corelli TB; Hoag MJ; Howell RJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 9148881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Sexual abuse of girls within the family--results of an analysis of expert psychological credibility assessment].
    Gaenslen-Jordan C; Appelt H; von Osterroht A
    Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 1990 Jul; 40(7):241-7. PubMed ID: 2392512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Assessing credibility in suspected sexual abuse of children].
    Volbert R
    Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr; 1995 Mar; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 7771120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Requests for compensation for immaterial damage: child and adolescent psychiatric legal assessment in conjunction with the revised legislation].
    Martinius J
    Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr; 1995 Mar; 23(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 7771123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Forensic psychiatry and the internet: practical perspectives on sexual predators and obsessional harassers in cyberspace.
    McGrath MG; Casey E
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 11931372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The admissibility of evidence in child sexual abuse cases.
    Gothard S
    Child Welfare; 1987; 66(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 3816337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. False memory syndrome: undermining the credibility of complainants in sexual offences.
    Raitt FE; Zeedyk MS
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2003; 26(5):453-71. PubMed ID: 14522220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Dynamics of child suggestibility in accusations of sexual abuse in divorce proceedings].
    du Bois R; Röcker D
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 1996 Nov; 45(9):339-43. PubMed ID: 9036386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Anatomically-neutral dolls: their effects on the memory and suggestibility of 4- to 6-year-old eyewitnesses.
    Samra J; Yuille JC
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1261-72. PubMed ID: 8985617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Sexualized doll play.
    Sonnenschein K; Licamele W
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1991 Jul; 30(4):694-5. PubMed ID: 1890108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Psycholegal issues in child sexual abuse evaluations: a survey of forensic mental health professionals.
    Oberlander LB
    Child Abuse Negl; 1995 Apr; 19(4):475-90. PubMed ID: 7606525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Interaction of normal children with anatomical dolls.
    Sivan AB; Schor DP; Koeppl GK; Noble LD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1988; 12(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 3167619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Putting the anatomical doll controversy in perspective: an examination of the major uses and criticisms of the dolls in child sexual abuse evaluations.
    Everson MD; Boat BW
    Child Abuse Negl; 1994 Feb; 18(2):113-29. PubMed ID: 8199895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Contested issues in the evaluation of child sexual abuse allegations: why consensus on best practice remains elusive.
    Faller KC; Everson MD
    J Child Sex Abus; 2012; 21(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 22339422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Putting the puzzle together: validating allegations of child sexual abuse.
    Heiman ML
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1992 Feb; 33(2):311-29. PubMed ID: 1564076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Anatomical doll play of preschoolers referred for sexual abuse and those not referred.
    Cohn DS
    Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):455-66. PubMed ID: 1959077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.