These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33790481)

  • 1. Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Use of Pegfilgrastim On-body Injector in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy Requiring Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Support.
    Patel J; Rainess RA; Benfield MJ; Rogers KML; Moore DC; Larck C; Arnall JR
    Hosp Pharm; 2021 Apr; 56(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 33790481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two decades of pegfilgrastim: what have we learned? Where do we go from here?
    De Oliveira Brandao C; Lewis S; Sandschafer D; Crawford J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 May; 39(5):707-718. PubMed ID: 36976784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective study to evaluate febrile neutropenia incidence in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector vs other choices.
    Rifkin RM; Crawford J; Mahtani RL; Dale DC; Narang M; MacLaughlin WW; Huynh C; Gawade PL; Lewis S; DeCosta L; Lawrence T; Belani R
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Oct; 30(10):7913-7922. PubMed ID: 35732748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector versus other options for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia: breast cancer subgroup analysis.
    Mahtani RL; Belani R; Crawford J; Dale D; DeCosta L; Gawade PL; Huynh C; Lawrence T; Lewis S; MacLaughlin WW; Narang M; Rifkin R
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):6135-6144. PubMed ID: 35426046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    McBride A; Krendyukov A; Mathieson N; Campbell K; Balu S; Natek M; MacDonald K; Abraham I
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 31433700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conversion from pegfilgrastim with on-body injector to pegfilgrastim-jmdb: cost-efficiency analysis and budget-neutral expanded access to prophylaxis and treatment.
    McBride A; MacDonald K; Fuentes-Alburo A; Abraham I
    J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):598-606. PubMed ID: 33866947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patterns of primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in older Medicare patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Schenfeld J; Gong T; Henry D; Kelsh M; Gawade P; Peng Y; Bradbury BD; Li S
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):6327-6338. PubMed ID: 35482126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patterns of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Gawade PL; Li S; Henry D; Smith N; Belani R; Kelsh MA; Bradbury BD
    Support Care Cancer; 2020 Sep; 28(9):4413-4424. PubMed ID: 31919669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a novel medical device for pegfilgrastim administration.
    Aruga T; Doihara H; Yanagita Y; Ishida T; Yamashita T; Uehara K; Taira T; Tsurutani J; Takeshita T; Tsuyuki S; Kaneko K; Ohtake T; Yamaguchi Y; Hara Y; Saji S
    Cancer Sci; 2022 May; 113(5):1763-1770. PubMed ID: 35293085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Randomized, Open-Label Study Conducted to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of Pegfilgrastim-cbqv On-Body Injector Versus Prefilled Syringe in Healthy Male Participants.
    Tang H; Civoli F; Tatarewicz S; Vandenkoornhuyse N; Finck B
    Adv Ther; 2024 Mar; 41(3):991-1009. PubMed ID: 38180721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia among patients receiving biweekly (Q2W) chemotherapy regimens: a systematic review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety.
    Mahtani R; Crawford J; Flannery SM; Lawrence T; Schenfeld J; Gawade PL
    BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):621. PubMed ID: 34044798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Mądry R; Popławska L; Haslbauer F; Šafanda M; Ghizdavescu D; Benkovicova J; Csőszi T; Mihaylov G; Niepel D; Jaeger C; Frkanova I; Macovei A; Staudigl C
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2016 Apr; 128(7-8):238-47. PubMed ID: 26745973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Administration options for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: patient and physician preferences from a cross-sectional survey.
    Brett Hauber A; Mange B; Price MA; Wolin D; Bensink M; Kaye JA; Chandler D
    Support Care Cancer; 2018 Jan; 26(1):251-260. PubMed ID: 28785862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Febrile neutropenia (FN) and pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving high (> 20%) FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study.
    Salmon JP; Smakal M; Karanikiotis C; Wojtukiewicz MZ; Omnes Y; DeCosta L; Wetten S; O'Kelly J
    Support Care Cancer; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 30259136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On-body injector pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia prophylaxis: Current Status.
    Abraham I; Crawford J; Schwartzberg L
    Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2024; 40():100824. PubMed ID: 38865836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients.
    Metz M; Semsek D; Rogmans G; Hutzschenreuter U; Fietz T; Harde J; Zacharias S; Hielscher C; Lorenz A; Zahn MO; Guth D; Liebers S; Berghorn M; Grebhardt S; Matillon CD; Egerer G; Potthoff K
    Support Care Cancer; 2021 Nov; 29(11):6633-6643. PubMed ID: 33956213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health professionals' preferences with the use of pegfilgrastim on-body injector at oncology centers in 8 cities in Colombia.
    Larrarte-González MA; Pineda-Posada M; Gaitán ÁA; Amaya-Amaya J; Ojeda K
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 May; 23(1):529. PubMed ID: 37221537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours.
    Aapro MS; Bohlius J; Cameron DA; Dal Lago L; Donnelly JP; Kearney N; Lyman GH; Pettengell R; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Walewski J; Weber DC; Zielinski C;
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jan; 47(1):8-32. PubMed ID: 21095116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of colony-stimulating factor primary prophylaxis and incidence of febrile neutropenia from 2010 to 2016: a longitudinal assessment.
    Weycker D; Bensink M; Lonshteyn A; Doroff R; Chandler D
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1073-1080. PubMed ID: 30550346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.