BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33791955)

  • 1. Statistical estimation of structural equation models with a mixture of continuous and categorical observed variables.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Oct; 53(5):2191-2213. PubMed ID: 33791955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables.
    Li CH
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):369-87. PubMed ID: 27571021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Monte Carlo study comparing PIV, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis.
    Nestler S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):127-43. PubMed ID: 22524532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data.
    Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 22568535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. More efficient parameter estimates for factor analysis of ordinal variables by ridge generalized least squares.
    Yuan KH; Jiang G; Cheng Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):525-564. PubMed ID: 28547838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods.
    Xia Y; Yang Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):409-428. PubMed ID: 29869222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An introduction to model implied instrumental variables using two stage least squares (MIIV-2SLS) in structural equation models (SEMs).
    Bollen KA; Fisher ZF; Giordano ML; Lilly AG; Luo L; Ye A
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Oct; 27(5):752-772. PubMed ID: 34323584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data.
    Savalei V
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 32054327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Influence of Number of Categories and Threshold Values on Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data.
    Xia Y; Yang Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):731-755. PubMed ID: 30477318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A unified model-implied instrumental variable approach for structural equation modeling with mixed variables.
    Jin S; Yang-Wallentin F; Bollen KA
    Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):564-594. PubMed ID: 34097200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.
    Rhemtulla M; Brosseau-Liard PÉ; Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):354-73. PubMed ID: 22799625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Model Parameterization and Estimation Methods on Tests of Measurement Invariance With Ordered Polytomous Data.
    Koziol NA; Bovaird JA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Apr; 78(2):272-296. PubMed ID: 29795956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GW-SEM: A Statistical Package to Conduct Genome-Wide Structural Equation Modeling.
    Verhulst B; Maes HH; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2017 May; 47(3):345-359. PubMed ID: 28299468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparative Study on the Performance of GSCA and CSA in Parameter Recovery for Structural Equation Models With Ordinal Observed Variables.
    Jung K; Panko P; Lee J; Hwang H
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2461. PubMed ID: 30568625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparison of ML, WLSMV, and Bayesian Methods for Multilevel Structural Equation Models in Small Samples: A Simulation Study.
    Holtmann J; Koch T; Lochner K; Eid M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):661-680. PubMed ID: 27594086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contributions to Estimation of Polychoric Correlations.
    Monroe S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(2):247-266. PubMed ID: 29377713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysing multitrait-multimethod data with structural equation models for ordinal variables applying the WLSMV estimator: what sample size is needed for valid results?
    Nussbeck FW; Eid M; Lischetzke T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):195-213. PubMed ID: 16709286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices.
    Shi D; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):421-445. PubMed ID: 32425213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.