BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33791955)

  • 21. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
    Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Categorical Omega With Small Sample Sizes via Bayesian Estimation: An Alternative to Frequentist Estimators.
    Yang Y; Xia Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Feb; 79(1):19-39. PubMed ID: 30636780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating FIML and multiple imputation in joint ordinal-continuous measurements models with missing data.
    Lim AJ; Cheung MW
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1063-1077. PubMed ID: 34545537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ordinary Least Squares Estimation of Parameters in Exploratory Factor Analysis With Ordinal Data.
    Lee CT; Zhang G; Edwards MC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Mar; 47(2):314-39. PubMed ID: 26734852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of latent and error non-normality on corrections to the test statistic in structural equation modeling.
    Jobst LJ; Auerswald M; Moshagen M
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2351-2363. PubMed ID: 35014004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implementation and evaluation of the SAEM algorithm for longitudinal ordered categorical data with an illustration in pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics.
    Savic RM; Mentré F; Lavielle M
    AAPS J; 2011 Mar; 13(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 21063925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Collinear Latent Variables in Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Comparison of Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Estimations.
    Can S; van de Schoot R; Hox J
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 75(3):406-427. PubMed ID: 29795827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sample Size Requirements for Applying Mixed Polytomous Item Response Models: Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
    Kutscher T; Eid M; Crayen C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2494. PubMed ID: 31798490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Two-Step Estimation of Models Between Latent Classes and External Variables.
    Bakk Z; Kuha J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Dec; 83(4):871-892. PubMed ID: 29150817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Maximum likelihood estimation in meta-analytic structural equation modeling.
    Oort FJ; Jak S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 27286901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Structural equation modeling with small sample sizes using two-stage ridge least-squares estimation.
    Jung S
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 22528958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Overfactoring in rating scale data: A comparison between factor analysis and item response theory.
    Revuelta J; Ximénez C; Minaya N
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():982137. PubMed ID: 36533017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pairwise Likelihood Ratio Tests and Model Selection Criteria for Structural Equation Models with Ordinal Variables.
    Katsikatsou M; Moustaki I
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1046-1068. PubMed ID: 27734296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robustness of Parameter Estimation to Assumptions of Normality in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
    Wang C; Su S; Weiss DJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):403-418. PubMed ID: 29624093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables.
    Lee SY; Poon WY; Bentler PM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 1995 Nov; 48 ( Pt 2)():339-58. PubMed ID: 8527346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two-stage path analysis with definition variables: An alternative framework to account for measurement error.
    Lai MHC; Hsiao YY
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Aug; 27(4):568-588. PubMed ID: 34881957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.
    Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Monte Carlo simulation of OLS and linear mixed model inference of phenotypic effects on gene expression.
    Walker JA
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2575. PubMed ID: 27761350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Are fit indices really fit to estimate the number of factors with categorical variables? Some cautionary findings via Monte Carlo simulation.
    Garrido LE; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):93-111. PubMed ID: 26651983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.