BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33792005)

  • 1. Breast Reconstruction Completion in the Obese: Does Reconstruction Technique Make a Difference in Its Achievement?
    Velazquez C; Siska RC; Pestana IA
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2021 Nov; 37(9):720-727. PubMed ID: 33792005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes Following Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Prior Mantle Radiation for Treatment of Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
    Freniere B; Irwin T; Guldbrandsen G; Lafleur EH; Dominici L; Sturgeon D; Chun YS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 May; 84(5):507-511. PubMed ID: 31663939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time to completion of nipple reconstruction: what factors are involved?
    Losken A; Duggal CS; Desai KA; McCullough MC; Gruszynski MA; Carlson GW
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 May; 70(5):530-2. PubMed ID: 23542858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Outcomes with Tissue Expander, Immediate Implant, and Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Greater Than 1000 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies.
    Frey JD; Choi M; Salibian AA; Karp NS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Jun; 139(6):1300-1310. PubMed ID: 28538548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Operative risk stratification in the obese female undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Rudolph M; Moore C; Pestana IA
    Breast J; 2019 Nov; 25(6):1182-1186. PubMed ID: 31659836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative assessment and risk factors for nipple-areolar complex malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
    Makiguchi T; Nakamura H; Fujii T; Yokoo S
    Breast Cancer; 2019 Jan; 26(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 29981009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mastectomy Skin Necrosis After Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis Between Autologous Reconstruction and Implant-Based Reconstruction.
    Sue GR; Lee GK
    Ann Plast Surg; 2018 May; 80(5S Suppl 5):S285-S287. PubMed ID: 29489546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconstructive Burnout after Mastectomy: Implications for Patient Selection.
    Halani SH; Jones K; Liu Y; Teotia SS; Haddock NT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Jan; 151(1):13e-19e. PubMed ID: 36194054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Analysis of Complication Risk Factors in 641 Nipple Reconstructions.
    Satteson ES; Reynolds MF; Bond AM; Pestana IA
    Breast J; 2016 Jul; 22(4):379-83. PubMed ID: 27038175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk.
    McCarthy CM; Mehrara BJ; Riedel E; Davidge K; Hinson A; Disa JJ; Cordeiro PG; Pusic AL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Jun; 121(6):1886-1892. PubMed ID: 18520873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants.
    Jabor MA; Shayani P; Collins DR; Karas T; Cohen BE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):457-63; discussion 464-5. PubMed ID: 12142660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Wound Complications After Immediate, Delayed, and Secondary Breast Reconstruction Procedures.
    Olsen MA; Nickel KB; Fox IK; Margenthaler JA; Wallace AE; Fraser VJ
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Sep; 152(9):e172338. PubMed ID: 28724125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications.
    Spear SL; Onyewu C
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Mar; 105(3):930-42. PubMed ID: 10724252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prepectoral Wise-Pattern Staged Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction for Obese or Ptotic Patients.
    Thuman J; Freitas AM; Schaeffer C; Campbell CA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 82(6S Suppl 5):S404-S409. PubMed ID: 30694844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors that influence the completion of breast reconstruction.
    Losken A; Carlson GW; Schoemann MB; Jones GE; Culbertson JH; Hester TR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2004 Mar; 52(3):258-61; discussion 262. PubMed ID: 15156978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience.
    Losken A; Carlson GW; Bostwick J; Jones GE; Culbertson JH; Schoemann M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jul; 110(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 12087236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.
    Pusic AL; Matros E; Fine N; Buchel E; Gordillo GM; Hamill JB; Kim HM; Qi J; Albornoz C; Klassen AF; Wilkins EG
    J Clin Oncol; 2017 Aug; 35(22):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 28346808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Breast in a Day": Examining Single-Stage Immediate, Permanent Implant Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Choi M; Frey JD; Alperovich M; Levine JP; Karp NS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Aug; 138(2):184e-191e. PubMed ID: 27465178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PATIENT SATISFACTION AFTER BREAST RECONSTRUCTION: IMPLANTS VS. AUTOLOGOUS TISSUES.
    Fracon S; Renzi N; Manara M; Ramella V; Papa G; Arnež ZM
    Acta Chir Plast; 2018; 59(3-4):120-128. PubMed ID: 29651851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction in the Obese Patient Using Abdominal Flaps: Complication Profile and Patient Satisfaction.
    Boczar D; Huayllani MT; Forte AJ; Rinker B
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Jun; 84(6S Suppl 5):S361-S363. PubMed ID: 32028469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.