These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33793255)

  • 1. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of an affective task-switching paradigm.
    Eckart C; Kraft D; Fiebach CJ
    Emotion; 2021 Aug; 21(5):921-931. PubMed ID: 33793255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in resilience to stress are associated with affective flexibility.
    Rademacher L; Kraft D; Eckart C; Fiebach CJ
    Psychol Res; 2023 Sep; 87(6):1862-1879. PubMed ID: 36528692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural correlates of affective task switching and asymmetric affective task switching costs.
    Eckart C; Kraft D; Rademacher L; Fiebach CJ
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2023 Feb; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 36226894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive, Affective, and Feedback-Based Flexibility - Disentangling Shared and Different Aspects of Three Facets of Psychological Flexibility.
    Kraft D; Rademacher L; Eckart C; Fiebach CJ
    J Cogn; 2020 Sep; 3(1):21. PubMed ID: 32984758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in reappraisal effectiveness: the role of affective flexibility.
    Malooly AM; Genet JJ; Siemer M
    Emotion; 2013 Apr; 13(2):302-13. PubMed ID: 23163706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emotional task management: neural correlates of switching between affective and non-affective task-sets.
    Reeck C; Egner T
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 10(8):1045-53. PubMed ID: 25552571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Keep flexible-Keep switching? Boundary conditions of the influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching.
    Fröber K; Jurczyk V; Dreisbach G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1249-1262. PubMed ID: 34941340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of objective and introspective switch costs in voluntary task choice.
    Mendl J; Dreisbach G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1373-1389. PubMed ID: 36222674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates affective flexibility.
    Aboulafia-Brakha T; Manuel AL; Ptak R
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jun; 86():13-8. PubMed ID: 27039163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of positive mood on flexible processing of affective information.
    Grol M; De Raedt R
    Emotion; 2018 Sep; 18(6):819-833. PubMed ID: 28714702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring individual differences in task switching.
    Li B; Li X; Stoet G; Lages M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():80-95. PubMed ID: 30599293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flexible control in processing affective and non-affective material predicts individual differences in trait resilience.
    Genet JJ; Siemer M
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Feb; 25(2):380-8. PubMed ID: 21432680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between affective flexibility, spontaneous emotion regulation and the response to induced stress.
    Grol M; De Raedt R
    Behav Res Ther; 2021 Aug; 143():103891. PubMed ID: 34091277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The subjective evaluation of task switch cues is related to voluntary task switching.
    Vermeylen L; Braem S; Notebaert W; Ruitenberg MFL
    Cognition; 2022 Jul; 224():105063. PubMed ID: 35183008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task sets define boundaries of learned cognitive flexibility in list-wide proportion switch manipulations.
    Siqi-Liu A; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1111-1122. PubMed ID: 37326527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual cortical regions show sufficient test-retest reliability while salience regions are unreliable during emotional face processing.
    McDermott TJ; Kirlic N; Akeman E; Touthang J; Cosgrove KT; DeVille DC; Clausen AN; White EJ; Kuplicki R; Aupperle RL
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 220():117077. PubMed ID: 32574806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of aging in a task-switch paradigm with the diffusion decision model.
    Ging-Jehli NR; Ratcliff R
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Sep; 35(6):850-865. PubMed ID: 32718157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of test-retest reliability in measuring individual and group differences in executive functioning.
    Paap KR; Sawi O
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Dec; 274():81-93. PubMed ID: 27720867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaction between emotional context-guided shifting and cognitive shifting: Introduction of a novel task.
    Biro B; Kokonyei G; De Oliveira Negrao R; Dancsik A; Karsai S; Logemann HNA; Cserjes R
    Neuropsychopharmacol Hung; 2021 Sep; 23(3):319-330. PubMed ID: 34751083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. To switch or not to switch? Individual differences in executive function and emotion regulation flexibility.
    Toh WX; Yang H
    Emotion; 2024 Feb; 24(1):52-66. PubMed ID: 37166830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.