These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33793270)

  • 1. The sensitivity of structural equation modeling with ordinal data to underlying non-normality and observed distributional forms.
    Foldnes N; Grønneberg S
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Aug; 27(4):541-567. PubMed ID: 33793270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On Identification and Non-normal Simulation in Ordinal Covariance and Item Response Models.
    Foldnes N; Grønneberg S
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1000-1017. PubMed ID: 31562591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.
    Rhemtulla M; Brosseau-Liard PÉ; Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):354-73. PubMed ID: 22799625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Penalized Least Squares for Structural Equation Modeling with Ordinal Responses.
    Huang PH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):279-297. PubMed ID: 32990059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robustness of Parameter Estimation to Assumptions of Normality in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
    Wang C; Su S; Weiss DJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):403-418. PubMed ID: 29624093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distributionally weighted least squares in structural equation modeling.
    Du H; Bentler PM
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Aug; 27(4):519-540. PubMed ID: 34166048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Latent and Error Non-Normality on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling.
    Jobst LJ; Auerswald M; Moshagen M
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Oct; 82(5):911-937. PubMed ID: 35989731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Problem with Discretizing Vale-Maurelli in Simulation Studies.
    Grønneberg S; Foldnes N
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):554-561. PubMed ID: 30838499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables.
    Li CH
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):369-87. PubMed ID: 27571021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Best Practices for Binary and Ordinal Data Analyses.
    Verhulst B; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2021 May; 51(3):204-214. PubMed ID: 33400061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data.
    Flora DB; Curran PJ
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Dec; 9(4):466-91. PubMed ID: 15598100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Normality assumption in latent interaction models.
    Lonati S; Rönkkö M; Antonakis J
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38573667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of latent and error non-normality on corrections to the test statistic in structural equation modeling.
    Jobst LJ; Auerswald M; Moshagen M
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2351-2363. PubMed ID: 35014004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factor analyzing ordinal items requires substantive knowledge of response marginals.
    Grønneberg S; Foldnes N
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Feb; 29(1):65-87. PubMed ID: 35588076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contributions to Estimation of Polychoric Correlations.
    Monroe S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(2):247-266. PubMed ID: 29377713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating methods for handling missing ordinal data in structural equation modeling.
    Jia F; Wu W
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Oct; 51(5):2337-2355. PubMed ID: 30684226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing estimation methods for psychometric networks with ordinal data.
    Johal SK; Rhemtulla M
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; 28(6):1251-1272. PubMed ID: 34928677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multivariate normal maximum likelihood with both ordinal and continuous variables, and data missing at random.
    Pritikin JN; Brick TR; Neale MC
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):490-500. PubMed ID: 29374390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. More efficient parameter estimates for factor analysis of ordinal variables by ridge generalized least squares.
    Yuan KH; Jiang G; Cheng Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):525-564. PubMed ID: 28547838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.