These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33793270)

  • 41. Improved least squares topology testing and estimation.
    Susko E
    Syst Biol; 2011 Oct; 60(5):668-75. PubMed ID: 21486744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Asymptotic Robustness Study of the Polychoric Correlation Estimation.
    Jin S; Yang-Wallentin F
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 27660261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Proportional-odds models for repeated composite and long ordinal outcome scales.
    Parsons NR
    Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(18):3181-91. PubMed ID: 23401181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The Influence of Number of Categories and Threshold Values on Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data.
    Xia Y; Yang Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):731-755. PubMed ID: 30477318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Univariate analysis of dichotomous or ordinal data from twin pairs: a simulation study comparing structural equation modeling and logistic regression.
    Ramakrishnan V; Meyer JM; Goldberg J; Henderson WG
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 8647380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Premature conclusions about the signal-to-noise ratio in structural equation modeling research: A commentary on Yuan and Fang (2023).
    Schuberth F; Schamberger T; Rönkkö M; Liu Y; Henseler J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):682-694. PubMed ID: 37070527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A two-stage estimation procedure for non-linear structural equation models.
    Holst KK; Budtz-Jørgensen E
    Biostatistics; 2020 Oct; 21(4):676-691. PubMed ID: 30698649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data.
    Savalei V
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 32054327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Which method delivers greater signal-to-noise ratio: Structural equation modelling or regression analysis with weighted composites?
    Yuan KH; Fang Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):646-678. PubMed ID: 37786372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Least squares estimation of variance components for linkage.
    Amos CI; Gu X; Chen J; Davis BR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S1-7. PubMed ID: 11055363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. New computations for RMSEA and CFI following FIML and TS estimation with missing data.
    Zhang X; Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Apr; 28(2):263-283. PubMed ID: 35007107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A Comparative Study on the Performance of GSCA and CSA in Parameter Recovery for Structural Equation Models With Ordinal Observed Variables.
    Jung K; Panko P; Lee J; Hwang H
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2461. PubMed ID: 30568625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A recommendation for applied researchers to substantiate the claim that ordinal variables are the product of underlying bivariate normal distributions.
    Kampen JK; Weeren A
    Qual Quant; 2017; 51(5):2163-2170. PubMed ID: 28867833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes.
    Walters SJ; Campbell MJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A semiparametric Bayesian approach for structural equation models.
    Song XY; Pan JH; Kwok T; Vandenput L; Ohlsson C; Leung PC
    Biom J; 2010 Jun; 52(3):314-32. PubMed ID: 20533410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluating FIML and multiple imputation in joint ordinal-continuous measurements models with missing data.
    Lim AJ; Cheung MW
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1063-1077. PubMed ID: 34545537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Methods for Multilevel Ordinal Data in Prevention Research.
    Hedeker D
    Prev Sci; 2015 Oct; 16(7):997-1006. PubMed ID: 24939751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The misuse of distributional assumptions in functional class scoring gene-set and pathway analysis.
    Ho CH; Huang YJ; Lai YJ; Mukherjee R; Hsiao CK
    G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 34791175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A novel modeling framework for ordinal data defined by collapsed counts.
    McGinley JS; Curran PJ; Hedeker D
    Stat Med; 2015 Jul; 34(15):2312-24. PubMed ID: 25857717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Maximum likelihood estimation in meta-analytic structural equation modeling.
    Oort FJ; Jak S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 27286901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.