These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33793291)

  • 21. How "none of the above" (NOTA) affects the accessibility of tested and related information in multiple-choice questions.
    Blendermann MF; Little JL; Gray KM
    Memory; 2020 Apr; 28(4):473-480. PubMed ID: 32106781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. OPTIMAL practice conditions enhance the benefits of gradually increasing error opportunities on retention of a stepping sequence task.
    Levac D; Driscoll K; Galvez J; Mercado K; O'Neil L
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Dec; 56(Pt B):129-138. PubMed ID: 29128736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning.
    Little JL; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 25123774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Errorful and errorless learning: The impact of cue-target constraint in learning from errors.
    Bridger EK; Mecklinger A
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):898-911. PubMed ID: 24615717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting as a learning strategy.
    Brod G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Dec; 28(6):1839-1847. PubMed ID: 33768503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping.
    Karpicke JD; Blunt JR
    Science; 2011 Feb; 331(6018):772-5. PubMed ID: 21252317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. From JOLs to JOLs+: Directing learners' attention in retrieval practice to boost integrative argumentation.
    Wong SSH; Lim SWH
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):543-557. PubMed ID: 31021111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Learning from errors: students' and instructors' practices, attitudes, and beliefs.
    Pan SC; Sana F; Samani J; Cooke J; Kim JA
    Memory; 2020 Oct; 28(9):1105-1122. PubMed ID: 32928077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The benefit of generating errors during learning: What is the locus of the effect?
    Potts R; Davies G; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1023-1041. PubMed ID: 30024254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sleep reduces the testing effect-But not after corrective feedback and prolonged retention interval.
    Abel M; Haller V; Köck H; Pötschke S; Heib D; Schabus M; Bäuml KT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):272-287. PubMed ID: 29698042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.
    Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 24579674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The pretesting effect thrives in the presence of competing information.
    Kliegl O; Bartl J; Bäuml KT
    Memory; 2023 May; 31(5):705-714. PubMed ID: 36927213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention.
    Roediger HL; Butler AC
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2011 Jan; 15(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 20951630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Memorial consequences of testing school-aged children.
    Marsh EJ; Fazio LK; Goswick AE
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):899-906. PubMed ID: 22891857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning?
    Richland LE; Kornell N; Kao LS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):243-57. PubMed ID: 19751074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.
    Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2007 Dec; 13(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 18194050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Where and how to learn: The interactive benefits of contextual variation, restudying, and retrieval practice for learning.
    Imundo MN; Pan SC; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):413-424. PubMed ID: 33174522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reversing the testing effect by feedback is a matter of performance criterion at practice.
    Racsmány M; Szőllősi Á; Marián M
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1161-1170. PubMed ID: 32418183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?
    Carpenter SK; Pashler H; Vul E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):826-30. PubMed ID: 17328380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.