These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33793574)

  • 1. Individual differences in the perception of probability.
    Khaw MW; Stevens L; Woodford M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Apr; 17(4):e1008871. PubMed ID: 33793574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probability Theory Plus Noise: Descriptive Estimation and Inferential Judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 10(1):192-208. PubMed ID: 29383882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments.
    Zhu JQ; Sanborn AN; Chater N
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Oct; 127(5):719-748. PubMed ID: 32191073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian perspective on magnitude estimation.
    Petzschner FH; Glasauer S; Stephan KE
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2015 May; 19(5):285-93. PubMed ID: 25843543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probability range and probability distortion in a gambling task.
    Xing C; Paul J; Zax A; Cordes S; Barth H; Patalano AL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():39-51. PubMed ID: 31096164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust averaging during perceptual judgment.
    de Gardelle V; Summerfield C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Aug; 108(32):13341-6. PubMed ID: 21788517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Naive Probability: Model-Based Estimates of Unique Events.
    Khemlani SS; Lotstein M; Johnson-Laird PN
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Aug; 39(6):1216-58. PubMed ID: 25363706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Risks of Ranking: Revisiting Graphical Perception to Model Individual Differences in Visualization Performance.
    Davis R; Pu X; Ding Y; Hall BD; Bonilla K; Feng M; Kay M; Harrison L
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2024 Mar; 30(3):1756-1771. PubMed ID: 37015487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive Anchoring Model: How Static and Dynamic Presentations of Time Series Influence Judgments and Predictions.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Tsaneva-Atanasova K; Juliusson A; Chater N
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 42(1):77-102. PubMed ID: 28382639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():106-33. PubMed ID: 27570097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The truth revisited: Bayesian analysis of individual differences in the truth effect.
    Schnuerch M; Nadarevic L; Rouder JN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):750-765. PubMed ID: 33104997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardinal rules: visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics.
    Girshick AR; Landy MS; Simoncelli EP
    Nat Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 14(7):926-32. PubMed ID: 21642976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A metacognitive approach to the study of motion-induced duration biases reveals inter-individual differences in forming confidence judgments.
    Bruno A; Sudkamp J; Souto D
    J Vis; 2023 Mar; 23(3):15. PubMed ID: 36971682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissecting the Roles of Supervised and Unsupervised Learning in Perceptual Discrimination Judgments.
    Loewenstein Y; Raviv O; Ahissar M
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 41(4):757-765. PubMed ID: 33380471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blushing-fearful individuals overestimate the costs and probability of their blushing.
    Dijk C; de Jong PJ
    Behav Res Ther; 2012 Feb; 50(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 22206720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is there something special with probabilities?--insight vs. computational ability in multiple risk combination.
    Juslin P; Lindskog M; Mayerhofer B
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():282-303. PubMed ID: 25514208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in first- and second-order temporal judgment.
    Corcoran AW; Groot C; Bruno A; Johnston A; Cropper SJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0191422. PubMed ID: 29401520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clarifying the relationship between coherence and accuracy in probability judgments.
    Zhu JQ; Newall PWS; Sundh J; Chater N; Sanborn AN
    Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():105022. PubMed ID: 35074619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intuitive symbolic magnitude judgments and decision making under risk in adults.
    Patalano AL; Zax A; Williams K; Mathias L; Cordes S; Barth H
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 May; 118():101273. PubMed ID: 32028073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.