These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33793574)

  • 21. A statistical law in the perception of risks and physical quantities in traffic.
    Elvik R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Sep; 82():36-44. PubMed ID: 26026971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Random variation and systematic biases in probability estimation.
    Howe R; Costello F
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Dec; 123():101306. PubMed ID: 33189032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Social and Contextual Constraints on Embodied Perception.
    Schnall S
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Mar; 12(2):325-340. PubMed ID: 28346118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Once a Utilitarian, Consistently a Utilitarian? Examining Principledness in Moral Judgment via the Robustness of Individual Differences.
    Helzer EG; Fleeson W; Furr RM; Meindl P; Barranti M
    J Pers; 2017 Aug; 85(4):505-517. PubMed ID: 27037484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment.
    Pronin E
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Jan; 11(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17129749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance-informed EEG analysis reveals mixed evidence for EEG signatures unique to the processing of time.
    Schlichting N; de Jong R; van Rijn H
    Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):352-369. PubMed ID: 29926169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Brain's Tendency to Bind Audiovisual Signals Is Stable but Not General.
    Odegaard B; Shams L
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Apr; 27(4):583-91. PubMed ID: 26944861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sample size bias in judgments of perceptual averages.
    Price PC; Kimura NM; Smith AR; Marshall LD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1321-31. PubMed ID: 24749965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How psychological framing affects economic market prices in the lab and field.
    Sonnemann U; Camerer CF; Fox CR; Langer T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Jul; 110(29):11779-84. PubMed ID: 23818628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The autocorrelated Bayesian sampler: A rational process for probability judgments, estimates, confidence intervals, choices, confidence judgments, and response times.
    Zhu JQ; Sundh J; Spicer J; Chater N; Sanborn AN
    Psychol Rev; 2024 Mar; 131(2):456-493. PubMed ID: 37289507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bayesian Models of Individual Differences.
    Powell G; Meredith Z; McMillin R; Freeman TC
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1562-1572. PubMed ID: 27770059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pillars of judgment: how memory abilities affect performance in rule-based and exemplar-based judgments.
    Hoffmann JA; von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Dec; 143(6):2242-61. PubMed ID: 25285427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Heuristics can produce surprisingly rational probability estimates: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Winman A
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jan; 123(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 26709414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Enhancing Analytical Reasoning in the Intensive Care Unit.
    Barash M; Nanchal RS
    Crit Care Clin; 2022 Jan; 38(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 34794631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Egocentric fairness perception: emotional reactions and individual differences in overt responses.
    Bediou B; Scherer KR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88432. PubMed ID: 24586326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exemplars in the mist: the cognitive substrate of the representativeness heuristic.
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Olsson H
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Jun; 49(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 18419587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Explaining the implicit negations effect in conditional inference: Experience, probabilities, and contrast sets.
    Vance J; Oaksford M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Feb; 150(2):354-384. PubMed ID: 32881565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Probability judgments of agency: rational or irrational?
    Schmidt T; Heumüller VC
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 20122851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two meanings of "if"? Individual differences in the interpretation of conditionals.
    Oberauer K; Geiger SM; Fischer K; Weidenfeld A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):790-819. PubMed ID: 17514595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.