These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33794101)

  • 1. Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data of Polish Patients from Real-Life Conditions: More Scanning and Better Glycemic Control Compared to Worldwide Data.
    Hohendorff J; Gumprecht J; Mysliwiec M; Zozulinska-Ziolkiewicz D; Malecki MT
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2021 Aug; 23(8):577-585. PubMed ID: 33794101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flash Glucose Monitoring in Croatia: The Optimal Number of Scans per Day to Achieve Good Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes.
    Canecki-Varzic S; Prpic-Krizevac I; Cigrovski Berkovic M; Rahelic D; Schonberger E; Gradiser M; Bilic-Curcic I
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Oct; 59(11):. PubMed ID: 38003943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Real-life 24-week changes in glycemic parameters among European users of flash glucose monitoring with type 1 and 2 diabetes and different levels of glycemic control.
    Lameijer A; Bakker JJ; Kao K; Xu Y; Gans ROB; Bilo HJG; Dunn TC; van Dijk PR
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2023 Jul; 201():110735. PubMed ID: 37276981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Metrics of Glycemic Control in Diabetes: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Maiorino MI; Signoriello S; Maio A; Chiodini P; Bellastella G; Scappaticcio L; Longo M; Giugliano D; Esposito K
    Diabetes Care; 2020 May; 43(5):1146-1156. PubMed ID: 32312858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of use and improvement in glycemic indices after initiating continuous glucose monitoring in real world: Data from Saudi Arabia.
    Alyusuf EY; Alharthi S; Alguwaihes AM; Jammah AA; Alfadda AA; Al-Sofiani ME
    Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2022 Feb; 16(2):102416. PubMed ID: 35150962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flash Glucose Monitoring in Israel: Understanding Real-World Associations between Self-Monitoring Frequency and Metrics of Glycemic Control.
    Eldor R; Roitman E; Merzon E; Toledano Y; Alves C; Tsur A
    Endocr Pract; 2022 May; 28(5):472-478. PubMed ID: 35167952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefits of a Switch from Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring (isCGM) to Real-Time (rt) CGM in Diabetes Type 1 Suboptimal Controlled Patients in Real-Life: A One-Year Prospective Study
    Préau Y; Galie S; Schaepelynck P; Armand M; Raccah D
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 34577338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of Switching from Intermittently Scanned to Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in a Type 1 Diabetes Patient French Cohort: An Observational Study of Clinical Practices.
    Préau Y; Armand M; Galie S; Schaepelynck P; Raccah D
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2021 Apr; 23(4):259-267. PubMed ID: 33136439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flash Glucose Monitoring in the Netherlands: Increased monitoring frequency is associated with improvement of glycemic parameters.
    Lameijer A; Lommerde N; Dunn TC; Fokkert MJ; Edens MA; Kao K; Xu Y; Gans ROB; Bilo HJG; van Dijk PR
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2021 Jul; 177():108897. PubMed ID: 34098059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glycemic, maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring during pregnancy - Pump vs multiple daily injections, a secondary analysis of an observational cohort study.
    Kjölhede K; Berntorp K; Kristensen K; Katsarou A; Shaat N; Wiberg N; Knop FK; Kristensen L; Dotevall A; Elfvin A; Sandgren U; Sengpiel V; Englund-Ögge L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 May; 100(5):927-933. PubMed ID: 33176006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-world flash glucose monitoring in Brazil: can sensors make a difference in diabetes management in developing countries?
    Calliari LEP; Krakauer M; Vianna AGD; Ram Y; Barbieri DE; Xu Y; Dunn TC
    Diabetol Metab Syndr; 2020; 12():3. PubMed ID: 31921360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in glucometric parameters in people living with diabetes users of the free-style libre 2 system before and after the update possibility to real-time glucose readings in real world practice.
    Pinés-Corrales PJ; López-García MC; Sanz-Velasco A; Moya-Moya AJ; Gonzalvo Díaz C; Blasco LG
    J Diabetes Complications; 2024 May; 38(5):108723. PubMed ID: 38593490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flash glucose monitoring reduces glycemic variability and hypoglycemia: real-world data from Spain.
    Gomez-Peralta F; Dunn T; Landuyt K; Xu Y; Merino-Torres JF
    BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care; 2020 Mar; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 32198165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glycemic Metrics Derived From Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring.
    Hansen KW; Bibby BM
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 Jan; 16(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 33269634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes.
    Avari P; Moscardo V; Jugnee N; Oliver N; Reddy M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):567-574. PubMed ID: 31375042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Frequency of Intermittently Scanned Glucose and Diurnal Variation of Glycemic Metrics.
    Hansen KW; Bibby BM
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 Nov; 16(6):1461-1465. PubMed ID: 34041961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association of scan frequency with CGM-derived metrics and influential factors in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
    Sakane N; Hirota Y; Yamamoto A; Miura J; Takaike H; Hoshina S; Toyoda M; Saito N; Hosoda K; Matsubara M; Tone A; Kawashima S; Sawaki H; Matsuda T; Domichi M; Suganuma A; Sakane S; Murata T
    Diabetol Int; 2024 Jan; 15(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 38264231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of unblinded and blinded intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring for glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes.
    Guo L; Li Y; Zhang M; Xiao X; Kuang H; Yang T; Jia X; Zhang X
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1110845. PubMed ID: 36909344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in continuous glucose monitoring metrics and predictors of improvement 12 months after conversion from Freestyle Libre to Freestyle Libre 2.
    Stimson RH; Dover AR; Strachan MWJ; Wright RJ; Forbes S; Gibb FW
    Diabet Med; 2023 Nov; 40(11):e15130. PubMed ID: 37151106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: Comparison of Holidays versus Schooldays.
    Al Hayek A; Alwin Robert A; Almonea K; Al Dawish MA
    Curr Diabetes Rev; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38310482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.