181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33795003)
1. Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews.
Chai KEK; Lines RLJ; Gucciardi DF; Ng L
Syst Rev; 2021 Apr; 10(1):93. PubMed ID: 33795003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a pharmaceutical science systematic review process using a semi-automated machine learning tool: Intravenous drug compatibility in the neonatal intensive care setting.
De Silva DTN; Moore BR; Strunk T; Petrovski M; Varis V; Chai K; Ng L; Batty KT
Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2024 Feb; 12(1):e1170. PubMed ID: 38204432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow.
Pham B; Jovanovic J; Bagheri E; Antony J; Ashoor H; Nguyen TT; Rios P; Robson R; Thomas SM; Watt J; Straus SE; Tricco AC
Syst Rev; 2021 May; 10(1):156. PubMed ID: 34039433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the accuracy of machine-assisted abstract screening with DistillerAI: a user study.
Gartlehner G; Wagner G; Lux L; Affengruber L; Dobrescu A; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Viswanathan M
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):277. PubMed ID: 31727159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools.
Gates A; Guitard S; Pillay J; Elliott SA; Dyson MP; Newton AS; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):278. PubMed ID: 31727150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deep Neural Network for Reducing the Screening Workload in Systematic Reviews for Clinical Guidelines: Algorithm Validation Study.
Yamada T; Yoneoka D; Hiraike Y; Hino K; Toyoshiba H; Shishido A; Noma H; Shojima N; Yamauchi T
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Dec; 22(12):e22422. PubMed ID: 33262102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated screening of research studies for systematic reviews using study characteristics.
Tsafnat G; Glasziou P; Karystianis G; Coiera E
Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 7(1):64. PubMed ID: 29695296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening Automation in Systematic Reviews: Analysis of Tools and Their Machine Learning Capabilities.
Sandner E; Gütl C; Jakovljevic I; Wagner A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2024 Apr; 313():179-185. PubMed ID: 38682527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decoding semi-automated title-abstract screening: findings from a convenience sample of reviews.
Gates A; Gates M; DaRosa D; Elliott SA; Pillay J; Rahman S; Vandermeer B; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 9(1):272. PubMed ID: 33243276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error.
Bannach-Brown A; Przybyła P; Thomas J; Rice ASC; Ananiadou S; Liao J; Macleod MR
Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):23. PubMed ID: 30646959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technology-assisted title and abstract screening for systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation of the Abstrackr machine learning tool.
Gates A; Johnson C; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):45. PubMed ID: 29530097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Automated Literature Review Tool (LiteRev) for Streamlining and Accelerating Research Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning: Descriptive Performance Evaluation Study.
Orel E; Ciglenecki I; Thiabaud A; Temerev A; Calmy A; Keiser O; Merzouki A
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Sep; 25():e39736. PubMed ID: 37713261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring the impact of screening automation on meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
Norman CR; Leeflang MMG; Porcher R; Névéol A
Syst Rev; 2019 Oct; 8(1):243. PubMed ID: 31661028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: comparative performance of Abstrackr and EPPI-Reviewer.
Tsou AY; Treadwell JR; Erinoff E; Schoelles K
Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 9(1):73. PubMed ID: 32241297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr's relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews.
Gates A; Gates M; Sebastianski M; Guitard S; Elliott SA; Hartling L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):139. PubMed ID: 32493228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review.
Khalil H; Ameen D; Zarnegar A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 144():22-42. PubMed ID: 34896236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
