These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33795616)

  • 1. The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age.
    Riggs WJ; Vaughan C; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Pellittieri A; Carter BL; Stegman CJ; He S
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1358-1372. PubMed ID: 33795616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationships Between the Auditory Nerve Sensitivity to Amplitude Modulation, Perceptual Amplitude Modulation Rate Discrimination Sensitivity, and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    He S; Skidmore J; Koch B; Chatterjee M; Carter BL; Yuan Y
    Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):371-384. PubMed ID: 36342278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics of the Adaptation Recovery Function of the Auditory Nerve and Its Association With Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    He S; Skidmore J; Carter BL
    Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1472-1486. PubMed ID: 35139051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural Adaptation of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Is Not Affected by Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened, Middle-aged, and Elderly Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    He S; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Riggs WJ; Carter BL; Xie R
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1228-1244. PubMed ID: 34999595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes and Electrophysiological Measures of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
    Skidmore J; Oleson JJ; Yuan Y; He S
    Ear Hear; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):1485-1497. PubMed ID: 37194125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Increasing Pulse Phase Duration on Neural Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve.
    He S; Xu L; Skidmore J; Chao X; Riggs WJ; Wang R; Vaughan C; Luo J; Shannon M; Warner C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1606-1618. PubMed ID: 33136636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal Response Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Implanted Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    He S; Abbas PJ; Doyle DV; McFayden TC; Mulherin S
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):397-411. PubMed ID: 26655913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Interphase Gap on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves.
    He S; Xu L; Skidmore J; Chao X; Jeng FC; Wang R; Luo J; Wang H
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):918-934. PubMed ID: 31688319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates.
    Haenggeli A; Zhang JS; Vischer MW; Pelizzone M; Rouiller EM
    Audiology; 1998; 37(6):353-71. PubMed ID: 9888192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effects of GJB2 or SLC26A4 Gene Mutations on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve in Children.
    Luo J; Xu L; Chao X; Wang R; Pellittieri A; Bai X; Fan Z; Wang H; He S
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):194-207. PubMed ID: 31124793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing Polarity Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Demographic Effects and Potential Implications for Estimating Neural Health.
    Hughes ML
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Apr; 23(2):301-318. PubMed ID: 34988867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Skidmore J; Carter BL; Riggs WJ; He S
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1300-1315. PubMed ID: 34935648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Laurello SA
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Pulse Polarity on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves.
    Xu L; Skidmore J; Luo J; Chao X; Wang R; Wang H; He S
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1306-1319. PubMed ID: 32141933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Goehring JL
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():44-56. PubMed ID: 25093283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Electrically Evoked Auditory Change Complex Evoked by Temporal Gaps Using Cochlear Implants or Auditory Brainstem Implants in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.
    He S; McFayden TC; Shahsavarani BS; Teagle HFB; Ewend M; Henderson L; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):482-494. PubMed ID: 28968281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.
    He S; Shahsavarani BS; McFayden TC; Wang H; Gill KE; Xu L; Chao X; Luo J; Wang R; He N
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):238-250. PubMed ID: 28678078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.