These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33796045)

  • 21. An Exploration of Rhythmic Grouping of Speech Sequences by French- and German-Learning Infants.
    Abboub N; Boll-Avetisyan N; Bhatara A; Höhle B; Nazzi T
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():292. PubMed ID: 27378887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech segmentation by statistical learning is supported by domain-general processes within working memory.
    Palmer SD; Mattys SL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Dec; 69(12):2390-2401. PubMed ID: 27167308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural correlates of prosodic boundary perception in German preschoolers: If pause is present, pitch can go.
    Männel C; Friederici AD
    Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1632():27-33. PubMed ID: 26683081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A multimodal corpus of speech to infant and adult listeners.
    Johnson EK; Lahey M; Ernestus M; Cutler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):EL534. PubMed ID: 25669300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pitch enhancement facilitates word learning across visual contexts.
    Filippi P; Gingras B; Fitch WT
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1468. PubMed ID: 25566144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distal prosody affects learning of novel words in an artificial language.
    Morrill TH; McAuley JD; Dilley LC; Zdziarska PA; Jones KB; Sanders LD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):815-23. PubMed ID: 25245269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual speech segmentation: using facial cues to locate word boundaries in continuous speech.
    Mitchel AD; Weiss DJ
    Lang Cogn Process; 2014; 29(7):771-780. PubMed ID: 25018577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Distal rhythm influences whether or not listeners hear a word in continuous speech: support for a perceptual grouping hypothesis.
    Morrill TH; Dilley LC; McAuley JD; Pitt MA
    Cognition; 2014 Apr; 131(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 24457086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The edge factor in early word segmentation: utterance-level prosody enables word form extraction by 6-month-olds.
    Johnson EK; Seidl A; Tyler MD
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e83546. PubMed ID: 24421892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.
    Barr DJ; Levy R; Scheepers C; Tily HJ
    J Mem Lang; 2013 Apr; 68(3):. PubMed ID: 24403724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The new statistics: why and how.
    Cumming G
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):7-29. PubMed ID: 24220629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Native language affects rhythmic grouping of speech.
    Bhatara A; Boll-Avetisyan N; Unger A; Nazzi T; Höhle B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3828-43. PubMed ID: 24180792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rhythmic grouping biases constrain infant statistical learning.
    Hay JF; Saffran JR
    Infancy; 2012 Nov; 17(6):610-641. PubMed ID: 23730217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The perception of lexical stress in German: effects of segmental duration and vowel quality in different prosodic patterns.
    Kohler KJ
    Phonetica; 2012; 69(1-2):68-93. PubMed ID: 23172240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Do humans and nonhuman animals share the grouping principles of the iambic-trochaic law?
    de la Mora DM; Nespor M; Toro JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 22956287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical learning and language acquisition.
    Romberg AR; Saffran JR
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2010 Nov; 1(6):906-914. PubMed ID: 21666883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Learnability of embedded syntactic structures depends on prosodic cues.
    Mueller JL; Bahlmann J; Friederici AD
    Cogn Sci; 2010 Mar; 34(2):338-49. PubMed ID: 21564216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acoustic markers of prominence influence infants' and adults' segmentation of speech sequences.
    Bion RA; Benavides-Varela S; Nespor M
    Lang Speech; 2011 Mar; 54(Pt 1):123-40. PubMed ID: 21524015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of the acoustic properties of infant-directed speech on infant word recognition.
    Song JY; Demuth K; Morgan J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 20649233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Word segmentation with universal prosodic cues.
    Endress AD; Hauser MD
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Sep; 61(2):177-99. PubMed ID: 20573342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.