These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33801666)

  • 1. Cattle Cleanliness from the View of Swedish Farmers and Official Animal Welfare Inspectors.
    Lundmark Hedman F; Andersson M; Kinch V; Lindholm A; Nordqvist A; Westin R
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 33801666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Animal welfare official inspections: farmers and inspectors shared concerns.
    Veissier I; Miele M; Mounier L
    Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100038. PubMed ID: 33515987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with cattle cleanliness on Norwegian dairy farms.
    Hauge SJ; Kielland C; Ringdal G; Skjerve E; Nafstad O
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 May; 95(5):2485-96. PubMed ID: 22541475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Welfare Problems in Finnish Cattle and Pig Farms Based on Official Inspection Reports.
    Väärikkälä S; Hänninen L; Nevas M
    Animals (Basel); 2019 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 31121864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-Compliance and Follow-Up in Swedish Official and Private Animal Welfare Control of Dairy Cows.
    Lundmark Hedman F; Hultgren J; Röcklinsberg H; Wahlberg B; Berg C
    Animals (Basel); 2018 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 29738491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptions of farming stakeholders towards automating dairy cattle mobility and body condition scoring in farm assurance schemes.
    Schillings J; Bennett R; Rose DC
    Animal; 2023 May; 17(5):100786. PubMed ID: 37075533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of cubicle characteristics on animal welfare indicators in dairy cattle.
    Gieseke D; Lambertz C; Gauly M
    Animal; 2020 Sep; 14(9):1934-1942. PubMed ID: 32264993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Invited review: Examining farmers' personalities and attitudes as possible risk factors for dairy cattle health, welfare, productivity, and farm management: A systematic scoping review.
    Adler F; Christley R; Campe A
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 May; 102(5):3805-3824. PubMed ID: 30852027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short communication: Accuracy of estimation of lameness, injury, and cleanliness prevalence by dairy farmers and veterinarians.
    Denis-Robichaud J; Kelton D; Fauteux V; Villettaz-Robichaud M; Dubuc J
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Nov; 103(11):10696-10702. PubMed ID: 32921451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An epidemiological analysis of equine welfare data from regulatory inspections by the official competent authorities.
    Hitchens PL; Hultgren J; Frössling J; Emanuelson U; Keeling LJ
    Animal; 2017 Jul; 11(7):1237-1248. PubMed ID: 27931268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between herd size and measures of animal welfare on dairy cattle farms with freestall housing in Germany.
    Gieseke D; Lambertz C; Gauly M
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Aug; 101(8):7397-7411. PubMed ID: 29778480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dairy farmers' expectations and receptivity regarding animal welfare advice: A focus group study.
    Croyle SL; Belage E; Khosa DK; LeBlanc SJ; Haley DB; Kelton DF
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7385-7397. PubMed ID: 31202646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevalence and risk factors for overweight horses at premises in Sweden assessed using official animal welfare control data.
    Hitchens PL; Hultgren J; Frössling J; Emanuelson U; Keeling LJ
    Acta Vet Scand; 2016 Oct; 58(Suppl 1):61. PubMed ID: 27766966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A participatory approach to design monitoring indicators of production diseases in organic dairy farms.
    Duval JE; Fourichon C; Madouasse A; Sjöström K; Emanuelson U; Bareille N
    Prev Vet Med; 2016 Jun; 128():12-22. PubMed ID: 27237386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptions of Australian cattle farmers regarding the impact of pinkeye on farm productivity and animal welfare.
    Kneipp M; Green AC; Govendir M; Laurence M; Dhand NK
    Prev Vet Med; 2022 Jul; 204():105665. PubMed ID: 35597103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On-farm biosecurity as perceived by professionals visiting Swedish farms.
    Nöremark M; Sternberg-Lewerin S
    Acta Vet Scand; 2014 May; 56(1):28. PubMed ID: 24886408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of routines that contribute to on-farm biosecurity as reported by Swedish livestock farmers.
    Nöremark M; Frössling J; Lewerin SS
    Transbound Emerg Dis; 2010 Aug; 57(4):225-36. PubMed ID: 20500492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use and non-use values as motivational construct dimensions for farm animal welfare: impacts on the economic outcome for the farm.
    Hansson H; Lagerkvist CJ; Azar G
    Animal; 2018 Oct; 12(10):2147-2155. PubMed ID: 29362012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Animal welfare problems from rearing to slaughter on cattle farms from an official veterinarian's perspective].
    Scheibl P
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere; 2020 Oct; 48(5):338-343. PubMed ID: 33080657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European organic dairy farmers' preference for animal health management within the farm management system.
    van Soest FJ; Mourits MC; Hogeveen H
    Animal; 2015 Nov; 9(11):1875-83. PubMed ID: 26179079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.