230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33802443)
21. Validity of caries detection on occlusal surfaces and treatment decisions based on results from multiple caries-detection methods.
Pereira AC; Eggertsson H; Martinez-Mier EA; Mialhe FL; Eckert GJ; Zero DT
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Feb; 117(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 19196318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Caries lesions diagnosis with deep convolutional neural network in intraoral QLF images by handheld device.
Tan R; Zhu X; Chen S; Zhang J; Liu Z; Li Z; Fan H; Wang X; Yang L
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):754. PubMed ID: 38951770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Detection of initial caries lesions on smooth surfaces by quantitative light-induced fluorescence and visual examination: an in vivo comparison.
Heinrich-Weltzien R; Kühnisch J; Ifland S; Tranaeus S; Angmar-Månsson B; Stösser L
Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):494-8. PubMed ID: 16324139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of a new infrared laser transillumination technology (808 nm) for the detection of occlusal caries-an in vitro study.
Bussaneli DG; Restrepo M; Boldieri T; Pretel H; Mancini MW; Santos-Pinto L; Cordeiro RC
Lasers Med Sci; 2015 Sep; 30(7):1873-9. PubMed ID: 25549960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions.
Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessing caries removal by undergraduate dental students using quantitative light-induced fluorescence.
Adeyemi AA; Jarad FD; Komarov GN; Pender N; Higham SM
J Dent Educ; 2008 Nov; 72(11):1318-23. PubMed ID: 18981210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of tooth wear based on autofluorescence properties measured using the QLF technology in vitro.
Lee HS; Lee YD; Kim SK; Choi JH; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2019 Mar; 25():265-270. PubMed ID: 30611863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Detection of proximal caries using quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital and laser fluorescence: a comparative study.
Yoon HI; Yoo MJ; Park EJ
J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Dec; 9(6):432-438. PubMed ID: 29279762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of fluorescence imaging with reflectance enhancement technology for early caries detection.
Amaechi BT; Ramalingam K
Am J Dent; 2014 Apr; 27(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 25000670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical performance of clinical-visual examination, digital bitewing radiography, laser fluorescence, and near-infrared light transillumination for detection of non-cavitated proximal enamel and dentin caries.
Kocak N; Cengiz-Yanardag E
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Sep; 35(7):1621-1628. PubMed ID: 32333336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Visual Examination, Fluorescence-Aided Caries Excavation (FACE) Technology, Bitewing X-Ray Radiography in the Detection of Occlusal Caries in First Permanent Molars in Children.
Blumer S; Kharouba J; Kats L; Schachter D; Azem H
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021 Jul; 45(3):152-157. PubMed ID: 34192750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of the Light-induced Fluorescent Intraoral Camera in Occlusal Caries Detection.
Alzayyat NA; Hafez RM; Yassen AA; Ibrahim SH
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):365-372. PubMed ID: 34267005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance of light-emitting diode device in detecting occlusal caries in the primary molars.
Diniz MB; Campos PH; Wilde S; Cordeiro RCL; Zandona AGF
Lasers Med Sci; 2019 Aug; 34(6):1235-1241. PubMed ID: 30673922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optical diagnosis of dentin caries lesions using quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology.
Lee JW; Lee ES; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2018 Sep; 23():68-70. PubMed ID: 29807148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of tooth wear by estimating enamel thickness with quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology.
Kim SK; Park SW; Lee HS; Lee ES; de Josselin de Jong E; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2019 Mar; 25():319-324. PubMed ID: 30648640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of dental enamel caries assessment using Quantitative Light Induced Fluorescence and Optical Coherence Tomography.
Maia AM; de Freitas AZ; de L Campello S; Gomes AS; Karlsson L
J Biophotonics; 2016 Jun; 9(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 26351155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars.
Chong MJ; Seow WK; Purdie DM; Cheng E; Wan V
Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of non-cavitated root caries lesions by quantitative light-induced fluorescence-An in vivo feasibility study.
Günther E; Park KJ; Meißner T; Kottmann T; Schmalz G; Haak R; Ziebolz D
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2020 Jun; 30():101671. PubMed ID: 31988025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
