These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33802920)

  • 1. Accurate Receptor-Ligand Binding Free Energies from Fast QM Conformational Chemical Space Sampling.
    Boz E; Stein M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 33802920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.
    Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method.
    Han K; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Nishikawa N; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1059-1073. PubMed ID: 30084077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Absolute binding free energies for the SAMPL6 cucurbit[8]uril host-guest challenge via the AMOEBA polarizable force field.
    Laury ML; Wang Z; Gordon AS; Ponder JW
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1087-1095. PubMed ID: 30324303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimates of ligand-binding affinities supported by quantum mechanical methods.
    Söderhjelm P; Kongsted J; Genheden S; Ryde U
    Interdiscip Sci; 2010 Mar; 2(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 20640794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A replica exchange umbrella sampling (REUS) approach to predict host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL8 challenge.
    Ghorbani M; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Aviat F; Meana-Pañeda R; Klauda JB; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 May; 35(5):667-677. PubMed ID: 33939083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of SAMPL4 host-guest binding affinities using funnel metadynamics.
    Hsiao YW; Söderhjelm P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 24535628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.
    Eken Y; Patel P; Díaz T; Jones MR; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 30225724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chemical accuracy for ligand-receptor binding Gibbs energies through multi-level SQM/QM calculations.
    Jameel F; Stein M
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 Aug; 26(31):21197-21203. PubMed ID: 39073067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conformational energies of microsolvated Na
    Otlyotov AA; Minenkov Y
    J Comput Chem; 2022 Oct; 43(27):1856-1863. PubMed ID: 36053781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.
    Song LF; Bansal N; Zheng Z; Merz KM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1013-1026. PubMed ID: 30143917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A QM protein-ligand investigation of antipsychotic drugs with the dopamine D2 Receptor (D2R).
    Ekhteiari Salmas R; Serhat Is Y; Durdagi S; Stein M; Yurtsever M
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2018 Aug; 36(10):2668-2677. PubMed ID: 28805144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blind prediction of SAMPL4 cucurbit[7]uril binding affinities with the mining minima method.
    Muddana HS; Yin J; Sapra NV; Fenley AT; Gilson MK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):463-74. PubMed ID: 24510191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calculations on noncovalent interactions and databases of benchmark interaction energies.
    Hobza P
    Acc Chem Res; 2012 Apr; 45(4):663-72. PubMed ID: 22225511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binding free energies for the SAMPL8 CB8 "Drugs of Abuse" challenge from umbrella sampling combined with Hamiltonian replica exchange.
    Markthaler D; Kraus H; Hansen N
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Jan; 36(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 34978001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting ligand binding affinity using on- and off-rates for the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge.
    Dixon T; Lotz SD; Dickson A
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1001-1012. PubMed ID: 30141102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binding free energies in the SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with MM and QM methods.
    Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Misini Ignjatović M; Wang M; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1027-1046. PubMed ID: 30203229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. BRD4: quantum mechanical protein-ligand binding free energies using the full-protein DFT-based QM-PBSA method.
    Gundelach L; Fox T; Tautermann CS; Skylaris CK
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 Oct; 24(41):25240-25249. PubMed ID: 36222107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How accurate is the description of ligand-protein interactions by a hybrid QM/MM approach?
    Kollar J; Frecer V
    J Mol Model; 2017 Dec; 24(1):11. PubMed ID: 29234892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protocols utilizing constant pH molecular dynamics to compute pH-dependent binding free energies.
    Kim MO; Blachly PG; Kaus JW; McCammon JA
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):861-72. PubMed ID: 25134690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.