127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33802944)
1. Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Mouthpiece for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Multi-Center, Randomized Study.
Ikebuchi Y; Matsumoto K; Ueda N; Yamashita T; Kurumi H; Onoyama T; Takeda Y; Yoshida A; Kawaguchi K; Yashima K; Fujiwara K; Imamoto R; Noma H; Ueki M; Isomoto H
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33802944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptability, Safety, and Feasibility of Transnasal and Peroral Ultrathin Endoscopy Using GAGLESS Mouthpieces: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Matsumoto K; Imagawa A; Ueda N; Watabe H; Ikebuchi Y; Kurumi H; Sasaki YU; Abe Y; Abe R; Mabe K; Noma H; Fujiwara K; Ueki M; Fujishiro M; Isomoto H
In Vivo; 2024; 38(2):826-832. PubMed ID: 38418116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Novel mouthpiece for reducing the gag reflex during esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Fujiwara K; Matsumoto K; Ueda N; Ueki M; Fukuhara T; Ikebuchi Y; Isomoto H; Takeuchi H
Dig Endosc; 2020 May; 32(4):534-540. PubMed ID: 31403215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the innovative endoscopic oropharyngeal airway and the conventional mouthpiece in elderly outpatients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy under sedation: a prospective and randomized study.
Zhang W; Zhu C; Chen X; Tao L; He K; Wu H; Chai X; Wang S; Xia M
BMC Gastroenterol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):8. PubMed ID: 34991464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of continuous suction mouthpiece during esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A single-center, prospective, randomized study.
Maekita T; Kato J; Nakatani Y; Enomoto S; Takano E; Tsuji M; Nakaya T; Moribata K; Muraki Y; Shingaki N; Niwa T; Deguchi H; Ueda K; Inoue I; Iguchi M; Tamai H; Ichinose M
World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 5(10):508-13. PubMed ID: 24147195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of audio and visual distraction on patients' vital signs and tolerance during esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Sogabe M; Okahisa T; Fukuya A; Kagemoto K; Okada Y; Adachi Y; Kurihara T; Nii T; Teramae S; Tanaka H; Tomonari T; Okamoto K; Miyamoto H; Nakasono M; Takayama T
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):122. PubMed ID: 32316918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unsedated ultrathin upper endoscopy is better than conventional endoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: a randomized trial.
Trevisani L; Cifalà V; Sartori S; Gilli G; Matarese G; Abbasciano V
World J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 13(6):906-11. PubMed ID: 17352021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with severe obesity undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Gedeon M; Gomes S; Roy K; Duclos-Miller P; Rose JS
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2019 Sep; 15(9):1589-1594. PubMed ID: 31402292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Yagi J; Adachi K; Arima N; Tanaka S; Ose T; Azumi T; Sasaki H; Sato M; Kinoshita Y
Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1226-31. PubMed ID: 16329022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classification of patients who experience a higher distress level to transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy than to transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Miyake K; Kusunoki M; Ueki N; Yamada A; Nagoya H; Kodaka Y; Shindo T; Kawagoe T; Gudis K; Futagami S; Tsukui T; Sakamoto C
Dig Endosc; 2013 Jul; 25(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 23368664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Wilkins T; Brewster A; Lammers J
J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):625-9. PubMed ID: 12160501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of unsedated transnasal endoscopy for pharyngeal observation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. A prospective study to assess cardiopulmonary function.
Tsuboi M; Arai M; Maruoka D; Matsumura T; Nakagawa T; Katsuno T; Yokosuka O
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):884-9. PubMed ID: 23731392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transnasal route: new approach to endoscopy.
Lee SY; Kawai T
Gut Liver; 2008 Dec; 2(3):155-65. PubMed ID: 20485641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective randomized comparative study of hemodynamic changes between ultrathin transnasal and conventional transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement with modified introducer method under sedation.
Suzuki R; Hikichi T; Sato M; Takagi T; Ikeda T; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Irisawa A; Obara K; Ohira H
Fukushima J Med Sci; 2011; 57(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 21701080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of a dedicated mouthpiece for the Valsalva maneuver to visualize the hypopharynx during transoral endoscopy.
Kato M; Hayashi Y; Uema R; Saiki H; Kimura K; Inoue T; Sakatani A; Yoshii S; Tsujii Y; Shinzaki S; Hida E; Iijima H; Takehara T
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Apr; 8(4):E536-E543. PubMed ID: 32258376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the effects on cardiopulmonary function of ultrathin transnasal versus normal diameter transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Japan.
Kawai T; Miyazaki I; Yagi K; Kataoka M; Kawakami K; Yamagishi T; Sofuni A; Itoi T; Moriyasu F; Osaka Y; Takagi Y; Aoki T
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007; 54(75):770-4. PubMed ID: 17591059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of procedural sequences in same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy: Single-center, prospective, randomized study.
Cao Y; Yang J; Li J; Ao X; Zhang KY; Shen XC; Chen DF; Lan CH
Dig Endosc; 2017 May; 29(3):330-337. PubMed ID: 28211094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy and safety of using premedication with simethicone/Pronase during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy examination with sedation: A single center, prospective, single blinded, randomized controlled trial.
Zhang LY; Li WY; Ji M; Liu FK; Chen GY; Wu SS; Hao Q; Zhai HH; Zhang ST
Dig Endosc; 2018 Jan; 30(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 28816373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of transnasal small-caliber vs. peroral conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating varices in unsedated cirrhotic patients.
Choe WH; Kim JH; Ko SY; Kwon SY; Kim BK; Rhee KH; Seo TH; Lee TY; Hong SN; Lee SY; Sung IK; Park HS; Shim CS
Endoscopy; 2011 Aug; 43(8):649-56. PubMed ID: 21660907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
