These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33803194)
1. Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Endocrown Biomechanical Response According to Different Pulp Chamber Extension Angles and Filling Materials. Tribst JPM; Lo Giudice R; Dos Santos AFC; Borges ALS; Silva-Concílio LR; Amaral M; Lo Giudice G Materials (Basel); 2021 Mar; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 33803194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different cavity design and CAD-CAM materials under a static and vertical load: A finite element analysis. Abtahi S; Alikhasi M; Siadat H J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):600.e1-600.e8. PubMed ID: 35016795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Endocrown Pulp Chamber Extension Depth on Molar Fracture Resistance. Hayes A; Duvall N; Wajdowicz M; Roberts H Oper Dent; 2017; 42(3):327-334. PubMed ID: 28467258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endocrown restorations: Influence of dental remnant and restorative material on stress distribution. Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; Madruga CFL; Valera MC; Borges ALS; Bresciani E; de Melo RM Dent Mater; 2018 Oct; 34(10):1466-1473. PubMed ID: 29935769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preparation Ferrule Design Effect on Endocrown Failure Resistance. Einhorn M; DuVall N; Wajdowicz M; Brewster J; Roberts H J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e237-e242. PubMed ID: 28985446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of margin design and restorative material on the stress distribution of endocrowns: a 3D finite element analysis. Zheng Z; Sun J; Jiang L; Wu Y; He J; Ruan W; Yan W BMC Oral Health; 2022 Feb; 22(1):30. PubMed ID: 35120525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis. Helal MA; Wang Z J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):988-996. PubMed ID: 29067737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling. Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rehabilitation of severely-destructed endodontically treated premolar teeth with novel endocrown system: Biomechanical behavior assessment through 3D finite element and in vitro analyses. Shams A; Elsherbini M; Elsherbiny AA; Özcan M; Sakrana AA J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():105031. PubMed ID: 34922296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical behavior and Weibull survival of CAD-CAM endocrowns with different marginal designs: A 3D finite element analysis. AboElhassan RG; Watts DC; Alamoush RA; Elraggal A Dent Mater; 2024 Feb; 40(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 37977990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Which materials would account for a better mechanical behavior for direct endocrown restorations? Sedrez-Porto JA; Münchow EA; Cenci MS; Pereira-Cenci T J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Mar; 103():103592. PubMed ID: 32090921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of restorative material and cement on the stress distribution of endocrowns: 3D finite element analysis. He J; Zheng Z; Wu M; Zheng C; Zeng Y; Yan W BMC Oral Health; 2021 Oct; 21(1):495. PubMed ID: 34610825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Adhesive Core Buildup Designs on the Resistance of Endodontically Treated Molars Restored With Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns. Carvalho AO; Bruzi G; Anderson RE; Maia HP; Giannini M; Magne P Oper Dent; 2016; 41(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 26266647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Restorative Material on Mechanical Response of Provisional Endocrowns: A 3D-FEA Study. Tribst JPM; Borges ALS; Silva-Concílio LR; Bottino MA; Özcan M Materials (Basel); 2021 Jan; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 33572533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The synergetic effect of pulp chamber extension depth and occlusal thickness on stress distribution of molar endocrowns: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Zhang Y; Lai H; Meng Q; Gong Q; Tong Z J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2022 Jun; 33(7):56. PubMed ID: 35723747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Full-Crown Versus Endocrown Approach: A 3D-Analysis of Both Restorations and the Effect of Ferrule and Restoration Material. Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; de Jager N; Bottino MA; de Kok P; Kleverlaan CJ J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(4):335-344. PubMed ID: 32856743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials. Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars restored with different endocrown designs: Finite element study. Aldesoki M; Bourauel C; Morsi T; El-Anwar MI; Aboelfadl AK; Elshazly TM J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Sep; 133():105309. PubMed ID: 35689987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials. Pedrollo Lise D; Van Ende A; De Munck J; Umeda Suzuki TY; Cardoso Vieira LC; Van Meerbeek B J Dent; 2017 Apr; 59():54-61. PubMed ID: 28214537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]