These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33804358)

  • 1. Analysis of The Reproducibility of Subgingival Vertical Margins Using Intraoral Optical Scanning (IOS): A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.
    Ferrari Cagidiaco E; Zarone F; Discepoli N; Joda T; Ferrari M
    J Clin Med; 2021 Mar; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 33804358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ability of marginal detection using different intraoral scanning systems: A pilot randomized controlled trial.
    Ferrari M; Keeling A; Mandelli F; Lo Giudice G; Garcia-Godoy F; Joda T
    Am J Dent; 2018 Oct; 31(5):272-276. PubMed ID: 30346675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of Preparation Design, Marginal Gingiva Location, and Tooth Morphology on the Accuracy of Digital Impressions for Full-Crown Restorations: An In Vitro Investigation.
    Bernauer SA; Müller J; Zitzmann NU; Joda T
    J Clin Med; 2020 Dec; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 33316958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of custom abutment data superimposition on the accuracy of implant abutment level scanning: An in vitro study.
    Baek YW; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1208-1217. PubMed ID: 35691713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impression of Subgingival Dental Preparation Can Be Taken with Ultrasound.
    Marotti J; Broeckmann J; Chuembou Pekam F; Praça L; Radermacher K; Wolfart S
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 45(2):558-567. PubMed ID: 30454854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Nyström I; Thor A
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 Feb; 18(1):27. PubMed ID: 29471825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
    Alshawaf B; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confounding factors affecting the marginal quality of an intra-oral scan.
    Keeling A; Wu J; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2017 Apr; 59():33-40. PubMed ID: 28189718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
    Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The precision of two alternative indirect workflows for digital model production: an illusion or a possibility?
    Elkersh NM; Fahmy RA; Zayet MK; Gaweesh YS; Hassan MG
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3787-3797. PubMed ID: 37046002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
    Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro.
    Zimmermann M; Ender A; Mehl A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Feb; 151(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 31883705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Nyström I; Rydén J; Thor A
    J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():110-118. PubMed ID: 29246490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of abutment tooth location on the accuracy of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner for removable partial dentures.
    Sakamoto K; Wada J; Arai Y; Hayama H; Ishioka Y; Kim EY; Kazama R; Toyoshima Y; Wakabayashi N
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Oct; 67(4):531-538. PubMed ID: 36775339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of trueness between conventional and digital impression in dental-supported fixed dental prosthesis with vertical preparation.
    García-Gil I; Perez de la Calle C; Lopez-Suarez C; Pontevedra P; Suarez MJ
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2020 Sep; 12(9):e896-e901. PubMed ID: 32994882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.