These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33805150)

  • 1. Validity of the Favero Assioma Duo Power Pedal System for Measuring Power Output and Cadence.
    Montalvo-Pérez A; Alejo LB; Valenzuela PL; Castellanos M; Gil-Cabrera J; Talavera E; Lucia A; Barranco-Gil D
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(7):. PubMed ID: 33805150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are Unilateral Devices Valid for Power Output Determination in Cycling? Insights From the Favero Assioma Power Meter.
    Valenzuela PL; Montalvo-Perez A; Alejo LB; Castellanos M; Gil-Cabrera J; Talavera E; Lucia A; Barranco-Gil D
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2022 Mar; 17(3):484-488. PubMed ID: 34969007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are the Assioma Favero Power Meter Pedals a Reliable Tool for Monitoring Cycling Power Output?
    Rodríguez-Rielves V; Lillo-Beviá JR; Buendía-Romero Á; Martínez-Cava A; Hernández-Belmonte A; Courel-Ibáñez J; Pallarés JG
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33921002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of the Favero Assioma Duo Power Pedal System in Maximal-Effort Cycling Tests.
    Yeh MC; Chen WH; Lu ST; Chen CH; Liu YC; Liu C
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2022 May; 17(5):800-805. PubMed ID: 35180707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and reliability of the Polar S710 mobile cycling powermeter.
    Millet GP; Tronche C; Fuster N; Bentley DJ; Candau R
    Int J Sports Med; 2003 Apr; 24(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 12740731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and Reliability of the PowerTap P1 Pedals Power Meter.
    Pallarés JG; Lillo-Bevia JR
    J Sports Sci Med; 2018 Jun; 17(2):305-311. PubMed ID: 29769832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and Reliability of the Stages Cycling Power Meter.
    Granier C; Hausswirth C; Dorel S; Le Meur Y
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Dec; 34(12):3554-3559. PubMed ID: 28902109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of cadence, cycling experience, and aerobic power on delta efficiency during cycling.
    Marsh AP; Martin PE; Foley KO
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9):1630-4. PubMed ID: 10994916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power production strategy during steady-state cycling is cadence dependent.
    Yamaguchi Y; Otsuka M; Wada N; Nishiyama T
    J Biomech; 2023 Sep; 158():111772. PubMed ID: 37643551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity and Reliability of the Cycleops Hammer Cycle Ergometer.
    Lillo-Bevia JR; Pallarés JG
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2018 Aug; 13(7):853-859. PubMed ID: 29182415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Two Portable Powermeters (Power2Max vs. PowerTap) to Measure Different Types of Efforts in Cycling.
    Iglesias-Pino J; Herrero-Molleda A; Saavedra-García MÁ; García-López J
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Sep; 23(18):. PubMed ID: 37765802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and reproducibility of the ErgomoPro power meter compared with the SRM and Powertap power meters.
    Duc S; Villerius V; Bertucci W; Grappe F
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2007 Sep; 2(3):270-81. PubMed ID: 19168927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between pedal force application technique and the ability to perform supramaximal pedaling cadences.
    Yamaguchi Y; Otsuka M; Watanabe K; Wada N; Nishiyama T
    Front Sports Act Living; 2022; 4():958827. PubMed ID: 36051966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Validity and Reliability of a Tire Pressure-Based Power Meter for Indoor Cycling.
    Fiolo NJ; Lu HY; Chen CH; Fuchs PX; Chen WH; Shiang TY
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 34577323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The force-velocity relationship of paralyzed quadriceps muscles during functional electrical stimulation cycling.
    Fornusek C; Sinclair PJ; Davis GM
    Neuromodulation; 2007 Jan; 10(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 22151814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity and Reliability of the Garmin Vector Power Meter in Laboratory and Field Cycling.
    Nimmerichter A; Schnitzer L; Prinz B; Simon D; Wirth K
    Int J Sports Med; 2017 Jun; 38(6):439-446. PubMed ID: 28460405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of critical power and the respiratory compensation point at slower and faster pedaling cadences.
    Micheli L; Teso M; Guluzade NA; Rizzo M; Ferri Marini C; Lucertini F; Keir DA; Pogliaghi S
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39231446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and reliability of the PowerTap mobile cycling powermeter when compared with the SRM Device.
    Bertucci W; Duc S; Villerius V; Pernin JN; Grappe F
    Int J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 26(10):868-73. PubMed ID: 16320172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences between sprint tests under laboratory and actual cycling conditions.
    Bertucci W; Taiar R; Grappe F
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2005 Sep; 45(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 16230977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is a joint moment-based cost function associated with preferred cycling cadence?
    Marsh AP; Martin PE; Sanderson DJ
    J Biomech; 2000 Feb; 33(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 10653030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.