124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33805230)
1. Modeling of Nanofiltration Process Using DSPM-DE Model for Purification of Amine Solution.
Ghorbani A; Bayati B; Drioli E; Macedonio F; Kikhavani T; Frappa M
Membranes (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 33805230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of NF Polymeric Membranes for Removal of Multicomponent Heat-Stable Salts (HSS) Ions from Methyl Diethanolamine (MDEA) Solutions.
Ghorbani A; Bayati B; Poerio T; Argurio P; Kikhavani T; Namdari M; Ferreira LM
Molecules; 2020 Oct; 25(21):. PubMed ID: 33114174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the "DSPM" model on a titania membrane: measurements of charged and uncharged solute retention, electrokinetic charge, pore size, and water permeability.
Labbez C; Fievet P; Thomas F; Szymczyk A; Vidonne A; Foissy A; Pagetti P
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2003 Jun; 262(1):200-11. PubMed ID: 16256596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes.
Yoon J; Amy G; Chung J; Sohn J; Yoon Y
Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of Flux and Rejection Coefficients in the Removal of Emerging Pollutants Using a Nanofiltration Membrane.
Hidalgo AM; Gómez M; Murcia MD; Gómez E; León G; Alfaro I
Membranes (Basel); 2023 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 37999354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Solute rejection by porous thin film composite nanofiltration membranes at high feed water recoveries.
Sharma RR; Chellam S
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2008 Dec; 328(2):353-66. PubMed ID: 18930248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.
J Vis Exp; 2023 May; (195):. PubMed ID: 37235796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening and Scale-up of Nanofiltration Membranes for Concentration of Lactose and Real Whey Permeate.
Hofmann K; Hamel C
Membranes (Basel); 2023 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36837676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Achieving low concentrations of chromium in drinking water by nanofiltration: membrane performance and selection.
Giagnorio M; Ruffino B; Grinic D; Steffenino S; Meucci L; Zanetti MC; Tiraferri A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(25):25294-25305. PubMed ID: 29946838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Removal of micropollutants from water by commercially available nanofiltration membranes.
Cuhorka J; Wallace E; Mikulášek P
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 720():137474. PubMed ID: 32325567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative performance of flat sheet and spiral wound modules in the nanofiltration of reactive dye solution.
Patel TM; Chheda H; Baheti A; Patel P; Nath K
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2011 Aug; 19(7):2994-3004. PubMed ID: 22351259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modelling of arsenic (III) removal from aqueous solution using film theory combined Spiegler-Kedem model: pilot-scale study.
Rajendran RM; Garg S; Bajpai S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(11):13886-13899. PubMed ID: 33205270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention of atenolol from single and binary aqueous solutions by thin film composite nanofiltration membrane: Transport modeling and pore radius estimation.
Taheri E; Hadi S; Amin MM; Ebrahimi A; Fatehizadeh A; Aminabhavi TM
J Environ Manage; 2020 Oct; 271():111005. PubMed ID: 32778290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of pH on Total Volume Membrane Charge Density in the Nanofiltration of Aqueous Solutions of Nitrate Salts of Heavy Metals.
Marecka-Migacz A; Mitkowski PT; Nędzarek A; Różański J; Szaferski W
Membranes (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 32937943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Carbon Dioxide Loading on Removal of Heat Stable Salts from Amine Solvent by Electrodialysis.
Grushevenko E; Bazhenov S; Vasilevsky V; Novitsky E; Shalygin M; Volkov A
Membranes (Basel); 2019 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 31766157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of cross flow velocity, feed concentration, and pressure on the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes in reactive dye having two sodium salts and NaCl mixtures: model application.
Koyuncu I; Topacik D
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2004; 39(4):1055-68. PubMed ID: 15137719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of pH and NaCl on the rejection of glycine and triglycine in binary solutions for desalination with diananofiltration.
Labanda J; Shahgodari S; Llorens J
Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e16797. PubMed ID: 37313174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-ionic electrolytes and E.coli removal from wastewater using chitosan-based in-situ mediated thin film composite nanofiltration membrane.
Shafi QI; Ihsan H; Hao Y; Wu X; Ullah N; Younas M; He B; Rezakazemi M
J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 294():112996. PubMed ID: 34126538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positively charged nanofiltration membrane synthesis, transport models, and lanthanides separation.
Léniz-Pizarro F; Liu C; Colburn A; Escobar IC; Bhattacharyya D
J Memb Sci; 2021 Feb; 620():. PubMed ID: 35002049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental study of dye removal from industrial wastewater by membrane technologies of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration.
Abid MF; Zablouk MA; Abid-Alameer AM
Iranian J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2012 Dec; 9(1):17. PubMed ID: 23369335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
