These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33805230)

  • 41. Hybrid system coupling ozonation and nanofiltration with functionalized catalytic ceramic membrane for ibuprofen removal.
    Szymański K; Mozia S; Ayral A; Brosillon S; Mendret J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(26):69042-69053. PubMed ID: 37129828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Study on the recovery of lithium from high Mg(2+)/Li(+) ratio brine by nanofiltration.
    Bi Q; Zhang Z; Zhao C; Tao Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 70(10):1690-4. PubMed ID: 25429459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of ion concentration and natural organic matter on arsenic(V) removal by nanofiltration under different transmembrane pressures.
    Yu Y; Zhao C; Wang Y; Fan W; Luan Z
    J Environ Sci (China); 2013 Feb; 25(2):302-7. PubMed ID: 23596950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Using Pressure-Driven Membrane Processes to Remove Emerging Pollutants from Aqueous Solutions.
    Hidalgo AM; León G; Murcia MD; Gómez M; Gómez E; Gómez JL
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(8):. PubMed ID: 33921335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Experiments and machine learning-based modeling for haloacetic acids rejection by nanofiltration: Influence of solute properties and operating conditions.
    Wang F; Wang W; Wang H; Zhao Z; Zhou T; Jiang C; Li J; Zhang X; Liang T; Dong W
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jul; 883():163610. PubMed ID: 37088392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Response surface methodology and artificial neural network modelling for the performance evaluation of pilot-scale hybrid nanofiltration (NF) & reverse osmosis (RO) membrane system for the treatment of brackish ground water.
    Srivastava A; K A; Nair A; Ram S; Agarwal S; Ali J; Singh R; Garg MC
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 278(Pt 1):111497. PubMed ID: 33130432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Micropollutant rejection by nanofiltration membranes: A mini review dedicated to the critical factors and modelling prediction.
    Xu R; Zhang Z; Deng C; Nie C; Wang L; Shi W; Lyu T; Yang Q
    Environ Res; 2024 Mar; 244():117935. PubMed ID: 38103781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Regeneration of process water containing surfactants by nanofiltration--investigation and modelling of mass transport.
    Wendler B; Goers B; Wozny G
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):287-92. PubMed ID: 12361023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Enhanced modelling and experimental validation of ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membrane system for treatment of synthetic brackish water.
    Norizam SS; Hussain MA; Junaidi MUM
    Water Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 84(10-11):3372-3387. PubMed ID: 34850734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fractionation of a galacto-oligosaccharides solution at low and high temperature using nanofiltration.
    Pruksasri S; Nguyen TH; Haltrich D; Novalin S
    Sep Purif Technol; 2015 Sep; 151():124-130. PubMed ID: 26681914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Nitrate removal from groundwater using negatively charged nanofiltration membrane.
    Zou L; Zhang S; Liu J; Cao Y; Qian G; Li YY; Xu ZP
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(33):34197-34204. PubMed ID: 30515691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Separating NOM from salts in ion exchange brine with ceramic nanofiltration.
    Caltran I; Rietveld LC; Shorney-Darby HL; Heijman SGJ
    Water Res; 2020 Jul; 179():115894. PubMed ID: 32408185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Influences of Technological Parameters on Cross-Flow Nanofiltration of Cranberry Juice.
    Lai DQ; Tagashira N; Hagiwara S; Nakajima M; Kimura T; Nabetani H
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Apr; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 33947156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Prediction of single salt rejection in PES/CMS based membranes.
    Qadir D; Idris A; Nasir R; Abdul Mannan H; Sharif R; Mukhtar H
    Chemosphere; 2023 Jan; 311(Pt 1):136987. PubMed ID: 36306961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Natural organic matter and sulphate elimination from rainwater with nanofiltration technology and process optimisation using response surface methodology.
    Köse-Mutlu B
    Water Sci Technol; 2021 Feb; 83(3):580-594. PubMed ID: 33600363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Recovery of dyes and salts from highly concentrated (dye and salt) mixed water using nano-filtration ceramic membranes.
    Mamun Kabir SM; Mahmud H; Schӧenberger H
    Heliyon; 2022 Nov; 8(11):e11543. PubMed ID: 36387485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Ultrafiltration membrane for effective removal of chromium ions from potable water.
    Muthumareeswaran MR; Alhoshan M; Agarwal GP
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():41423. PubMed ID: 28134266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Scaling Risk Assessment in Nanofiltration of Mine Waters.
    Mitko K; Laskowska E; Turek M; Dydo P; Piotrowski K
    Membranes (Basel); 2020 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 33076424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Separation of Drugs by Commercial Nanofiltration Membranes and Their Modelling.
    Nayak V; Cuhorka J; Mikulášek P
    Membranes (Basel); 2022 May; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 35629854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Separation of Cd and Ni from multicomponent aqueous solutions by nanofiltration and characterization of membrane using IT model.
    Chaudhari LB; Murthy ZV
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Aug; 180(1-3):309-15. PubMed ID: 20452729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.